kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, tech@virtualopensystems.com,
	n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com, agraf@suse.de,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MA..." <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] ARM: KVM: on unhandled IO mem abort, route the call to the KVM MMIO bus
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:09:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140328190913.GJ25519@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394726249-1547-2-git-send-email-a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:57:26PM +0100, Antonios Motakis wrote:
> On an unhandled IO memory abort, use the kvm_io_bus_* API in order to
> handle the MMIO access through any registered read/write callbacks. This
> is a dependency for eventfd support (ioeventfd and irqfd).
> 
> However, accesses to the VGIC are still left implemented independently,
> since the kvm_io_bus_* API doesn't pass the VCPU pointer doing the access.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Nikolaev <n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c |  5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> index 4cb5a93..1d17831 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmio.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,35 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * kvm_handle_mmio - handle an in-kernel MMIO access
> + * @vcpu:	pointer to the vcpu performing the access
> + * @run:	pointer to the kvm_run structure
> + * @mmio:	pointer to the data describing the access
> + *
> + * returns true if the MMIO access has been performed in kernel space,
> + * and false if it needs to be emulated in user space.
> + */
> +static bool handle_kernel_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
> +		struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	if (mmio->is_write) {
> +		ret = kvm_io_bus_write(vcpu->kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, mmio->phys_addr,
> +				mmio->len, &mmio->data);
> +
> +	} else {
> +		ret = kvm_io_bus_read(vcpu->kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, mmio->phys_addr,
> +				mmio->len, &mmio->data);
> +	}
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		kvm_prepare_mmio(run, mmio);
> +		kvm_handle_mmio_return(vcpu, run);
> +	}
> +
> +	return !ret;
> +}
> +
>  int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  		 phys_addr_t fault_ipa)
>  {
> @@ -200,6 +229,9 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  	if (vgic_handle_mmio(vcpu, run, &mmio))
>  		return 1;
>  
> +	if (handle_kernel_mmio(vcpu, run, &mmio))
> +		return 1;
> +

this special-casing of the vgic is now really terrible.  Is there
anything holding you back from doing the necessary restructure of the
kvm_bus_io_*() API instead?  That would allow us to get rid of the ugly
Fix it! in the vgic driver as well.

-Christoffer

>  	kvm_prepare_mmio(run, &mmio);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 8ca405c..afdecc3 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -849,13 +849,16 @@ struct mmio_range *find_matching_range(const struct mmio_range *ranges,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * vgic_handle_mmio - handle an in-kernel MMIO access
> + * vgic_handle_mmio - handle an in-kernel vgic MMIO access
>   * @vcpu:	pointer to the vcpu performing the access
>   * @run:	pointer to the kvm_run structure
>   * @mmio:	pointer to the data describing the access
>   *
>   * returns true if the MMIO access has been performed in kernel space,
>   * and false if it needs to be emulated in user space.
> + *
> + * This is handled outside of kvm_handle_mmio because the kvm_io_bus only
> + * passes the VM pointer, while we need the VCPU performing the access.
>   */
>  bool vgic_handle_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  		      struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio)
> -- 
> 1.8.3.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-28 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1394726249-1547-1-git-send-email-a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>
2014-03-13 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] ARM: KVM: on unhandled IO mem abort, route the call to the KVM MMIO bus Antonios Motakis
2014-03-28 19:09   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2014-03-29 17:34     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-10 15:09     ` Nikolay Nikolaev
2014-11-10 16:27       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-13 10:45         ` Nikolay Nikolaev
2014-11-13 11:20           ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-13 11:20             ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-13 11:37             ` Marc Zyngier
2014-11-13 11:52               ` Andre Przywara
2014-11-13 12:29                 ` Nikolay Nikolaev
2014-11-13 12:52                   ` Andre Przywara
2014-11-13 14:16           ` Eric Auger
2014-11-13 14:23             ` Eric Auger
2014-11-13 15:02               ` Nikolay Nikolaev
2014-11-13 15:13                 ` Christoffer Dall
2014-11-13 15:31                 ` Andre Przywara
2014-11-13 16:07                   ` Eric Auger
2014-03-13 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: irqfd should depend on CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING Antonios Motakis
2014-03-13 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] ARM: KVM: enable linking against eventfd Antonios Motakis
2014-03-13 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] ARM: KVM: enable KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD Antonios Motakis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140328190913.GJ25519@cbox \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tech@virtualopensystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).