From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
gleb@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vmx: speed up wildcard MMIO EVENTFD
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:04:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140417170426.GA9781@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140417123354.GA16748@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 03:33:55PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:50:44PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > With KVM, MMIO is much slower than PIO, due to the need to
> > do page walk and emulation. But with EPT, it does not have to be: we
> > know the address from the VMCS so if the address is unique, we can look
> > up the eventfd directly, bypassing emulation.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this only works if userspace does not need to match on
> > access length and data. The implementation adds a separate FAST_MMIO
> > bus internally. This serves two purposes:
> > - minimize overhead for old userspace that does not use eventfd with lengtth = 0
> > - minimize disruption in other code (since we don't know the length,
> > devices on the MMIO bus only get a valid address in write, this
> > way we don't need to touch all devices to teach them to handle
> > an invalid length)
> >
> > At the moment, this optimization only has effect for EPT on x86.
> >
> > It will be possible to speed up MMIO for NPT and MMU using the same
> > idea in the future.
> >
> > With this patch applied, on VMX MMIO EVENTFD is essentially as fast as PIO.
> > I was unable to detect any measureable slowdown to non-eventfd MMIO.
> >
> > Making MMIO faster is important for the upcoming virtio 1.0 which
> > includes an MMIO signalling capability.
> >
> > The idea was suggested by Peter Anvin. Lots of thanks to Gleb for
> > pre-review and suggestions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> Ping.
> Marcelo, any chance you could merge this for 3.16?
Applied, note: KVM_CAP_ number change.
FYI: "skip_emulated_instruction" breaks instructions which are composed of
other parts than just the 0-length eventfd register access, eg. rep mov.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-17 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-31 18:50 [PATCH 1/2] kvm: support any-length wildcard ioeventfd Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-03-31 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] vmx: speed up wildcard MMIO EVENTFD Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-04-17 12:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-04-17 17:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140417170426.GA9781@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox