From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Jones Subject: kvm-unit-tests: repo next branch Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:20:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20140418132029.GA9583@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1662 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752745AbaDRNUg (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:20:36 -0400 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3IDKa8o025996 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:20:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Should we remove the next branch from the kvm-unit-tests repo? It's way, way behind master. Alternatively, we could fast- forward it to start using it, but it's probably not necessary. drew