From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: target-i386: block migration and savevm if invariant tsc is exposed (v3) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:47:47 -0300 Message-ID: <20140425224747.GB27753@amt.cnet> References: <20140423182002.441209839@amt.cnet> <20140423182539.391512909@amt.cnet> <20140423190941.GN3363@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20140423210444.GA4305@amt.cnet> <20140424192159.GR3363@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20140424213242.GA29412@amt.cnet> <20140425203808.GW3363@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , Igor Mammedov To: Eduardo Habkost Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23574 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751650AbaDYWtC (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:49:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140425203808.GW3363@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:38:08PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > Have you tested if your patch actually blocks savevm? Yes, with -smp 2. Can you please include the savevm.c patch in your queue? TIA.