From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for 2014-04-28
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:51:24 +0300
Message-ID: <20140429055124.GA12031@redhat.com>
References: <8738gxgary.fsf@elfo.mitica>
 <8761ltwjqt.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31813 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755016AbaD2Guh (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 02:50:37 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8761ltwjqt.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:34:34PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
> 
> [...]
> 
> I'd like to have these things settled sooner than five minutes before
> the scheduled hour, so here goes: call or no call?  Agenda?

If not too late, I'd like to discuss our security process.
Do we as the project generally agree to use responsible disclosure policy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsible_disclosure ?