From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] kvmtool: handle guests of a different endianness Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 14:34:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20140506133410.GF30234@arm.com> References: <1398363443-3764-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <536495CF.6070203@iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Marc Zyngier , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Pekka Enberg To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:35576 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752546AbaEFNed (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 09:34:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <536495CF.6070203@iki.fi> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Pekka, On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 08:07:59AM +0100, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 4/24/14 9:17 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > This patch series adds some infrastructure to kvmtool to allow a BE > > guest to use virtio-mmio on a LE host, provided that the architecture > > actually supports such madness. > > > > Not all the backend have been converted, only those I actually cared > > about. Converting them is pretty easy though, and will be done if the > > method is deemed acceptable. > > > > This has been tested on both arm and arm64 (I use this on a daily > > basis to test BE code). The corresponding kernel changes have all been > > merged. > > Will, comments? I'm OK with this. I'd like to take a closer look at the last patch, so please hold off merging these for the moment. Cheers, Will