From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Herrmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] MIPS: Add functions for hypervisor call Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20140521073005.GE11800@alberich> References: <1400597236-11352-1-git-send-email-andreas.herrmann@caviumnetworks.com> <1400597236-11352-10-git-send-email-andreas.herrmann@caviumnetworks.com> <3231132.Bvkfloh7jN@radagast> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: , David Daney , Ralf Baechle , , David Daney To: James Hogan Return-path: Received: from mail-bl2lp0203.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.203]:43348 "EHLO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751642AbaEUHbp (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 03:31:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3231132.Bvkfloh7jN@radagast> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:16:30AM +0100, James Hogan wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2014 16:47:10 Andreas Herrmann wrote: > > From: David Daney > > > > Signed-off-by: David Daney > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann > These look similar to the kvm_hypercall${n} functions in > arch/{x86,s390}/include/asm/kvm_para.h. Does it make sense to define > that API in kvm_para.h for MIPS instead of this one? Yes, the functions should be moved to a separate header. Andreas