From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] add 2nd stage page fault handling during live migration Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 10:42:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20140529084206.GA61607@lvm> References: <1400178451-4984-1-git-send-email-m.smarduch@samsung.com> <1400178451-4984-5-git-send-email-m.smarduch@samsung.com> <20140527201945.GD16428@lvm> <53853C2F.8080003@samsung.com> <20140528080957.GH16428@lvm> <5386232A.3050602@samsung.com> <53862DF8.80709@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, sungjinn.chung@samsung.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Steve Capper To: Mario Smarduch Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:36031 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932777AbaE2ImG (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2014 04:42:06 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e16so9898lan.0 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 01:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53862DF8.80709@samsung.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:42:00AM -0700, Mario Smarduch wrote: > > >emslot dirty_bitmap during and after write protect. > > > >> > >> -Christoffer > > Regarding huge pud that's causing some design problems, should huge PUD > pages be considered at all? > I'm not sure if there is any support for this on aarch64 or anyone planning to work on this. Steve? -Christoffer