From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: "andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] perf ignore LBR and offcore_rsp.
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:31:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140708143113.GQ19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077014CDF76@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1142 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:22:25PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > This too is wrong in many ways; there's more than 2 extra_msrs on many
> > systems.
> >
> Right, there are four extra reg types on Intel systems. Since my
> previous test only triggers the crash with RSP_0 and RSP_1, so I only
> handle these two msrs. I will handle all the extra msrs then.
Yeah, so to other two are PEBS related, and I think we disable PEBS
early on so you'll never hit them or something; didn't look too closely.
> > And the place you check is abysmal, if we know at init time that we don't
> > have those MSRs, WTF do you allow event creation that would use them,
> > only to then misbehave?
>
> Right, we can check it at all the possible creation places. I think
> the most common place to check should be x86_pmu_extra_regs. For
> RSP_0 and RSP_1, I also plan to do the check in intel_fixup_er, so
> extra_reg will not be updated. For LBR select, lbr_sel_map will be
> cleared at runtime once check_msr failed. Besides the three places,
> is there any place I missed?
I think that's sufficient; but didn't stare too hard.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-08 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-07 13:34 [PATCH V3 1/2] perf ignore LBR and offcore_rsp kan.liang
2014-07-07 13:34 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] kvm: ignore LBR and offcore rsp kan.liang
2014-07-08 9:25 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] perf ignore LBR and offcore_rsp Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-08 14:20 ` Liang, Kan
2014-07-08 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-08 14:22 ` Liang, Kan
2014-07-08 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140708143113.GQ19379@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox