From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: vmx: fix ept reserved bits for 1-GByte page
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:17:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140819021741.GA2003@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53F1D313.5010108@redhat.com>
Hi Paolo,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:18:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>Il 18/08/2014 11:50, Wanpeng Li ha scritto:
>> EPT misconfig handler in kvm will check which reason lead to EPT
>> misconfiguration after vmexit. One of the reasons is that an EPT
>> paging-structure entry is configured with settings reserved for
>> future functionality. However, the handler can't identify if
>> paging-structure entry of reserved bits for 1-GByte page are
>> configured, since PDPTE which point to 1-GByte page will reserve
>> bits 29:12 instead of bits 7:3 which are reserved for PDPTE that
>> references an EPT Page Directory. This patch fix it by reserve
>> bits 29:12 for 1-GByte page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index bfe11cf..71cbee5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -5521,9 +5521,14 @@ static u64 ept_rsvd_mask(u64 spte, int level)
>> for (i = 51; i > boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits; i--)
>> mask |= (1ULL << i);
>>
>> - if (level > 2)
>> - /* bits 7:3 reserved */
>> - mask |= 0xf8;
>> + if (level > 2) {
>
>level can be 4 here. You have to return 0xf8 for level == 4.
>
>The same "if" statement then can cover both 2MB and 1GB pages, like
>
> if (spte & (1ULL << 7))
> /* 1GB/2MB page, bits 29:12 or 20:12 reserved respectively */
> mask |= (PAGE_SIZE << ((level - 1) * 9)) - PAGE_SIZE;
> else
> /* bits 6:3 reserved */
> mask |= 0x78;
>
>> - if (level == 1 || (level == 2 && (spte & (1ULL << 7)))) {
>> + if (level == 1 || ((level == 3 || level == 2)
>> + && (spte & (1ULL << 7)))) {
>
>This condition can be simplified by checking the return value of ept_rsvd_mask.
>If it includes 0x38, this is a large page. Otherwise it is a leaf page and
>you can go down the "if".
As you know, 5:3 bits which used for EPT MT are not reserved bits, so
I fail to understand why check the return value of ept_rsvd_mask and
it's a large page if includes 0x38. Could you eplain in more details? ;-)
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>
>Paolo
>
>> u64 ept_mem_type = (spte & 0x38) >> 3;
>>
>> if (ept_mem_type == 2 || ept_mem_type == 3 ||
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-19 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 9:50 [PATCH 1/5] KVM: vmx: fix ept reserved bits for 1-GByte page Wanpeng Li
2014-08-18 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86: drop fpu_activate hook Wanpeng Li
2014-08-18 10:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-18 10:26 ` Avi Kivity
2014-08-18 10:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-18 11:15 ` Avi Kivity
2014-08-18 10:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-18 9:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: vmx: don't vmx_segment_cache_clear twice in enter_pmode Wanpeng Li
2014-08-18 10:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-18 9:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: fix check legal type of Variable Range MTRRs Wanpeng Li
2014-08-18 10:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-18 9:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86: #GP when attempts to write reserved bits " Wanpeng Li
2014-08-18 12:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-08-18 12:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-18 10:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: vmx: fix ept reserved bits for 1-GByte page Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-19 2:17 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2014-08-19 6:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-18 10:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2014-08-18 11:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140819021741.GA2003@kernel \
--to=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox