From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wanpeng Li Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Dynamic Pause Loop Exiting window. Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:45:03 +0800 Message-ID: <20140822044503.GB4807@kernel> References: <1408637291-18533-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com> <53F61EAC.2000004@redhat.com> <20140821165002.GG20453@potion.brq.redhat.com> Reply-To: Wanpeng Li Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov , Raghavendra KT , Vinod Chegu , Hui-Zhi Zhao , Christian Borntraeger , Lisa Mitchell To: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140821165002.GG20453@potion.brq.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Hi Radim, On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:50:03PM +0200, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 w= rote: >2014-08-21 18:30+0200, Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 21/08/2014 18:08, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 ha scritto: >> I'm not sure of the usefulness of patch 6, so I'm going to drop it. >> I'll keep it in my local junkyard branch in case it's going to be us= eful >> in some scenario I didn't think of. > >I've been using it to benchmark different values, because it is more Is there any benchmark data for this patchset? Regards, Wanpeng Li=20 >convenient than reloading the module after shutting down guests. >(And easier to sell than writing to kernel memory.) > >I don't think the additional code is worth it though. > >> Patch 7 can be easily rebased, so no need to repost (and I might eve= n >> squash it into patch 3, what do you think?). > >Yeah, the core is already a huge patch, so it does look weird without >squashing. (No-one wants to rebase to that point anyway.) > >Thanks. >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html