From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-vfio: do not use module_init Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 12:44:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20140924114435.GD28823@arm.com> References: <1411558149-3609-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Gleb Natapov , Alex Williamson To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1411558149-3609-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:29:09PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > /me got confused between the kernel and QEMU. In the kernel, you can > only have one module_init function, and it will prevent unloading the > module unless you also have the corresponding module_exit function. Happy for you to take the blame, but I think this one's my fault! > So, commit 80ce1639727e (KVM: VFIO: register kvm_device_ops dynamically, > 2014-09-02) broke unloading of the kvm module, by adding a module_init > function and no module_exit. I forget kvm builds as a module for other architectures (ie. not arm/arm64). > Repair it by making kvm_vfio_ops_init weak, and checking it in > kvm_init. Hehe, if only there was a kconfig option for kvm-vfio.c... Will