From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86: DR7.GD should be cleared upon any #DB exception
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:22:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141001192230.GE12083@potion.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05CDC095-E68B-4BB0-94DE-1BC3202C4217@gmail.com>
2014-10-01 21:22+0300, Nadav Amit:
>
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > 2014-09-30 20:49+0300, Nadav Amit:
> >> Intel SDM 17.2.4 (Debug Control Register (DR7)) says: "The processor clears the
> >> GD flag upon entering to the debug exception handler." This sentence may be
> >> misunderstood as if it happens only on #DB due to debug-register protection,
> >> but it happens regardless to the cause of the #DB.
> >
> > All real hardware behaves that way?
> I have no way of knowing.
:)
> I know Intel’s phrasing is misleading, so I verified this behaviour in two ways:
> 1. I changed KVM not to trap #DB. I then changed kvm-unit-tests/debug.c to set DR7.GD prior to the watchpoint test, and printed once I entered the handler, before any DR was accessed by the handler.
> The result: we entered the handler once (afterwards I printed DR7 and saw GD is indeed clear). If #DB due to watchpoint did not clear GD, we would enter the handler twice.
Thanks.
> 2. I looked at bochs: https://github.com/larsr/bochs-svn/blob/master/cpu/exception.cc :
>
> if (vector == BX_DB_EXCEPTION) {
> // Commit debug events to DR6: preserve DR5.BS and DR6.BD values,
> // only software can clear them
> BX_CPU_THIS_PTR dr6.val32 = (BX_CPU_THIS_PTR dr6.val32 & 0xffff6ff0) |
> (BX_CPU_THIS_PTR debug_trap & 0x0000e00f);
>
> // clear GD flag in the DR7 prior entering debug exception handler
> BX_CPU_THIS_PTR dr7.set_GD(0);
> }
(Ok.)
> The behaviour seems reasonable to me. Otherwise the CPU would re-enter the handler when the handler inspects DR6.
It usually is sufficient just to read it, but yeah, re-entry for the
general usage isn't nice either.
To the patch itself: We could use kvm_x86_ops->set_dr7() directly, but
maybe we are going to do something with on GD bit, so
Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-01 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 17:49 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: Miscellaneous bug fixes Nadav Amit
2014-09-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86: DR7.GD should be cleared upon any #DB exception Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 15:24 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-01 18:22 ` Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 19:22 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2014-09-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86: Wrong error code on limit violation during emulation Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 15:44 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-27 14:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-27 14:46 ` Nadav Amit
2014-10-27 14:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: NoBigReal was mistakenly considering la instead of ea Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 15:58 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-02 14:52 ` Nadav Amit
2014-10-03 12:50 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-06 15:19 ` Nadav Amit
2014-09-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86: Fix determining flat mode in recalculate_apic_map Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 16:04 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-01 17:30 ` Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 18:27 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-01 19:16 ` Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 20:58 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-04 6:50 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-09-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Wrong assertion on paging_tmpl.h Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 16:26 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-01 17:14 ` Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 17:54 ` Radim Krčmář
2014-10-08 9:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-30 17:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86: Emulator does not calculate address correctly Nadav Amit
2014-10-01 17:21 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141001192230.GE12083@potion.brq.redhat.com \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).