From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Zhang Haoyu" <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmarking for vhost polling patch
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:30:08 +0800
Message-ID: <201410301930058431451@sangfor.com>
References: <1414586281-razya@il.ibm.com>,
 <20141029123831.A80F338002D@moren.haifa.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "razya" <razya@il.ibm.com>, "kvm" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: "Razya Ladelsky" <razya@il.ibm.com>, "mst" <mst@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp.sanfor.com ([58.251.49.30]:50576 "EHLO mail.sangfor.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1758559AbaJ3LaZ (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:30:25 -0400
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

> Hi Michael,
> 
> Following the polling patch thread: http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=140853271510179&w=2, 
> I changed poll_stop_idle to be counted in micro seconds, and carried out 
> experiments using varying sizes of this value. The setup for netperf consisted of 
> 1 vm and 1 vhost , each running on their own dedicated core.
> 
Could you provide your changing code?

Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu