From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 11/12] virtio-net/virtio-blk: enable virtio 1.0 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:34:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20141127113420.2eaaa82f.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> References: <1417022923-1654-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <1417022923-1654-12-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <20141126185005.GA9549@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.107]:37663 "EHLO e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751761AbaK0Ke2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 05:34:28 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:34:26 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677D32190056 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:33:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.251]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sARAYMTN15270038 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:34:22 GMT Received: from d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sARAYLIK028503 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 03:34:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20141126185005.GA9549@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:50:05 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:28:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > virtio-net (non-vhost) and virtio-blk have everything in place to support > > virtio 1.0: let's enable the feature bit for them. > > Hmm I doubt that. > At least not without more patches. > > For block, scsi, wce and config-wce must be off, and > it must support ANY_LAYOUT (which might be a bit more code). > > For net, header size is different when mergeable bufs are off, > and mac is read-only. Yeah, I'll need to walk through the spec again, this was mainly to test my changes.