From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [patch -rt 2/2] KVM: lapic: mark LAPIC timer handler as irqsafe Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:43:52 -0200 Message-ID: <20141204134352.GA28510@amt.cnet> References: <20141125172108.992070524@redhat.com> <20141125172329.580701786@redhat.com> <5474BE7C.5040909@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Luiz Capitulino , Rik van Riel , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5474BE7C.5040909@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 06:38:04PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 25/11/2014 18:21, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > + > > + if (r == HRTIMER_RESTART) { > > + do { > > + ret = hrtimer_start_expires(data, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); > > + if (ret == -ETIME) > > + hrtimer_add_expires_ns(&ktimer->timer, > > + ktimer->period); > > Is it possible to just compute the time where the next interrupt > happens? Yes but there is no guarantee hrtimer_start_expires will not fail. > I suspect the printk and WARN_ON below can be easily triggered > by a guest. I'll remove those, thanks.