From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo.Tosatti@amt.cnet, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] KVM: x86: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:34:11 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141210173411.GA21295@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54887DFE.3070904@redhat.com>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 06:08:14PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 10/12/2014 17:53, Marcelo.Tosatti@amt.cnet wrote:
> > For the hrtimer which emulates the tscdeadline timer in the guest,
> > add an option to advance expiration, and busy spin on VM-entry waiting
> > for the actual expiration time to elapse.
> >
> > This allows achieving low latencies in cyclictest (or any scenario
> > which requires strict timing regarding timer expiration).
> >
> > Reduces cyclictest avg latency by 50%.
> >
> > Note: this option requires tuning to find the appropriate value
> > for a particular hardware/guest combination. One method is to measure the
> > average delay between apic_timer_fn and VM-entry.
> > Another method is to start with 1000ns, and increase the value
> > in say 500ns increments until avg cyclictest numbers stop decreasing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
> What is the latency value that you find in practice, for both
> apic_timer_fn to vmentry? Or for apic_timer_fn to just before vmrun?
7us between apic_timer_fn and kvm_entry tracepoint.
> Let's start with a kvm-unit-tests patch to measure this value.
I can, but kvm-unit-test register state will not be similar to
actual guest state (think host/guest state loading).
What is the advantage of using a kvm-unit-test test rather
than cyclictest in the guest ?
> We can then decide whether to hardcode a small default value (e.g.
> 1000-3000) and make it a module parameter? Or perhaps start with a
> higher value (twice what you find in practice?) and adjust it towards a
> target every time wait_lapic_expire is called. But in order to judge
> the correct approach, I need to see the numbers.
Problem with automatic adjustment is: what is the correct target?
You want faster instances of apic_timer_fn->vm-entry to spin a bit,
and allow slow instances of apic_timer_fn->vm-entry to have
an effective advancement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-10 16:53 [patch 0/2] KVM: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration Marcelo.Tosatti
2014-12-10 16:53 ` [patch 1/2] KVM: x86: add method to test PIR bitmap vector Marcelo.Tosatti
2014-12-10 16:53 ` [patch 2/2] KVM: x86: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration Marcelo.Tosatti
2014-12-10 17:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-10 17:34 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2014-12-10 17:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-10 17:06 [patch 0/2] KVM: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-10 17:06 ` [patch 2/2] KVM: x86: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-10 17:11 ` Rik van Riel
2014-12-10 20:57 [patch 0/2] KVM: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-10 20:57 ` [patch 2/2] KVM: x86: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-10 23:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-11 3:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-11 18:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-11 20:48 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-11 20:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-11 21:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-11 21:37 ` Rik van Riel
2014-12-11 21:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-11 21:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-12-11 21:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-11 21:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-12-12 18:35 ` Radim Krcmar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141210173411.GA21295@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=Marcelo.Tosatti@amt.cnet \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox