[patch 0/3] KVM: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration (v4)

[patch 0/3] KVM: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration (v4)

[Marcelo Tosatti]

See patches for details.

v2:
- fix email address.

v3:
- use module parameter for configuration of value (Paolo/Radim)

v4:
- fix check for tscdeadline mode while waiting for expiration (Paolo)
- use proper delay function (Radim)
- fix LVTT tscdeadline mode check in hrtimer interrupt handler (Radim)
- add comment regarding PPR and APICv (Paolo)

[patch 1/3] KVM: x86: add method to test PIR bitmap vector

[Marcelo Tosatti]

[-- Attachment #1: add-test-pir --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2342 bytes --]

kvm_x86_ops->test_posted_interrupt() returns true/false depending
whether 'vector' is set.

Next patch makes use of this interface.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

Index: kvm/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ kvm/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
 	void (*set_virtual_x2apic_mode)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool set);
 	void (*set_apic_access_page_addr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, hpa_t hpa);
 	void (*deliver_posted_interrupt)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
+	bool (*test_posted_interrupt)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
 	void (*sync_pir_to_irr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	int (*set_tss_addr)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int addr);
 	int (*get_tdp_level)(void);
Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -435,6 +435,11 @@ static int pi_test_and_set_pir(int vecto
 	return test_and_set_bit(vector, (unsigned long *)pi_desc->pir);
 }
 
+static int pi_test_pir(int vector, struct pi_desc *pi_desc)
+{
+	return test_bit(vector, (unsigned long *)pi_desc->pir);
+}
+
 struct vcpu_vmx {
 	struct kvm_vcpu       vcpu;
 	unsigned long         host_rsp;
@@ -5939,6 +5944,7 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
 	else {
 		kvm_x86_ops->hwapic_irr_update = NULL;
 		kvm_x86_ops->deliver_posted_interrupt = NULL;
+		kvm_x86_ops->test_posted_interrupt = NULL;
 		kvm_x86_ops->sync_pir_to_irr = vmx_sync_pir_to_irr_dummy;
 	}
 
@@ -6960,6 +6966,13 @@ static int handle_invvpid(struct kvm_vcp
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static bool vmx_test_pir(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector)
+{
+	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
+
+	return pi_test_pir(vector, &vmx->pi_desc);
+}
+
 /*
  * The exit handlers return 1 if the exit was handled fully and guest execution
  * may resume.  Otherwise they set the kvm_run parameter to indicate what needs
@@ -9374,6 +9387,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops =
 	.hwapic_isr_update = vmx_hwapic_isr_update,
 	.sync_pir_to_irr = vmx_sync_pir_to_irr,
 	.deliver_posted_interrupt = vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt,
+	.test_posted_interrupt = vmx_test_pir,
 
 	.set_tss_addr = vmx_set_tss_addr,
 	.get_tdp_level = get_ept_level,

[patch 2/3] KVM: x86: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration

[Marcelo Tosatti]

[-- Attachment #1: lapic-timer-advance --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5366 bytes --]

For the hrtimer which emulates the tscdeadline timer in the guest,
add an option to advance expiration, and busy spin on VM-entry waiting
for the actual expiration time to elapse.

This allows achieving low latencies in cyclictest (or any scenario 
which requires strict timing regarding timer expiration).

Reduces average cyclictest latency from 12us to 8us
on Core i5 desktop.

Note: this option requires tuning to find the appropriate value 
for a particular hardware/guest combination. One method is to measure the 
average delay between apic_timer_fn and VM-entry. 
Another method is to start with 1000ns, and increase the value
in say 500ns increments until avg cyclictest numbers stop decreasing.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include <asm/page.h>
 #include <asm/current.h>
 #include <asm/apicdef.h>
+#include <asm/delay.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/jump_label.h>
 #include "kvm_cache_regs.h"
@@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ static void apic_timer_expired(struct kv
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = apic->vcpu;
 	wait_queue_head_t *q = &vcpu->wq;
+	struct kvm_timer *ktimer = &apic->lapic_timer;
 
 	/*
 	 * Note: KVM_REQ_PENDING_TIMER is implicitly checked in
@@ -1087,11 +1089,64 @@ static void apic_timer_expired(struct kv
 
 	if (waitqueue_active(q))
 		wake_up_interruptible(q);
+
+	if (apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic))
+		ktimer->expired_tscdeadline = ktimer->tscdeadline;
+}
+
+/*
+ * On APICv, this test will cause a busy wait
+ * during a higher-priority task.
+ */
+
+static bool lapic_timer_int_injected(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
+	u32 reg = kvm_apic_get_reg(apic, APIC_LVTT);
+
+	if (kvm_apic_hw_enabled(apic)) {
+		int vec = reg & APIC_VECTOR_MASK;
+
+		if (kvm_x86_ops->test_posted_interrupt)
+			return kvm_x86_ops->test_posted_interrupt(vcpu, vec);
+		else {
+			if (apic_test_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
+				return true;
+		}
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
+void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
+	u64 guest_tsc, tsc_deadline;
+
+	if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
+		return;
+
+	if (apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline == 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (!lapic_timer_int_injected(vcpu))
+		return;
+
+	tsc_deadline = apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline;
+	apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline = 0;
+	guest_tsc = kvm_x86_ops->read_l1_tsc(vcpu, native_read_tsc());
+
+	while (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline) {
+		int delay = min(tsc_deadline - guest_tsc, 1000ULL);
+
+		__delay(delay);
+		guest_tsc = kvm_x86_ops->read_l1_tsc(vcpu, native_read_tsc());
+	}
 }
 
 static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
 {
 	ktime_t now;
+
 	atomic_set(&apic->lapic_timer.pending, 0);
 
 	if (apic_lvtt_period(apic) || apic_lvtt_oneshot(apic)) {
@@ -1137,6 +1192,7 @@ static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_
 		/* lapic timer in tsc deadline mode */
 		u64 guest_tsc, tscdeadline = apic->lapic_timer.tscdeadline;
 		u64 ns = 0;
+		ktime_t expire;
 		struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = apic->vcpu;
 		unsigned long this_tsc_khz = vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz;
 		unsigned long flags;
@@ -1151,8 +1207,10 @@ static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_
 		if (likely(tscdeadline > guest_tsc)) {
 			ns = (tscdeadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL;
 			do_div(ns, this_tsc_khz);
+			expire = ktime_add_ns(now, ns);
+			expire = ktime_sub_ns(expire, lapic_timer_advance_ns);
 			hrtimer_start(&apic->lapic_timer.timer,
-				ktime_add_ns(now, ns), HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+				      expire, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
 		} else
 			apic_timer_expired(apic);
 
Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
+++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct kvm_timer {
 	u32 timer_mode;
 	u32 timer_mode_mask;
 	u64 tscdeadline;
+	u64 expired_tscdeadline;
 	atomic_t pending;			/* accumulated triggered timers */
 };
 
@@ -170,4 +171,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_apic_has_events(s
 
 bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
 
+void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
 #endif
Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_max_guest_tsc_khz)
 static u32 tsc_tolerance_ppm = 250;
 module_param(tsc_tolerance_ppm, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
 
+/* lapic timer advance (tscdeadline mode only) in nanoseconds */
+unsigned int lapic_timer_advance_ns = 0;
+module_param(lapic_timer_advance_ns, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
+
 static bool backwards_tsc_observed = false;
 
 #define KVM_NR_SHARED_MSRS 16
@@ -6311,6 +6315,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_v
 	}
 
 	trace_kvm_entry(vcpu->vcpu_id);
+	wait_lapic_expire(vcpu);
 	kvm_x86_ops->run(vcpu);
 
 	/*
Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
+++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
@@ -170,5 +170,7 @@ extern u64 kvm_supported_xcr0(void);
 
 extern unsigned int min_timer_period_us;
 
+extern unsigned int lapic_timer_advance_ns;
+
 extern struct static_key kvm_no_apic_vcpu;
 #endif

Re: [patch 2/3] KVM: x86: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 15/12/2014 23:06, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> For the hrtimer which emulates the tscdeadline timer in the guest,
> add an option to advance expiration, and busy spin on VM-entry waiting
> for the actual expiration time to elapse.
> 
> This allows achieving low latencies in cyclictest (or any scenario 
> which requires strict timing regarding timer expiration).
> 
> Reduces average cyclictest latency from 12us to 8us
> on Core i5 desktop.
> 
> Note: this option requires tuning to find the appropriate value 
> for a particular hardware/guest combination. One method is to measure the 
> average delay between apic_timer_fn and VM-entry. 
> Another method is to start with 1000ns, and increase the value
> in say 500ns increments until avg cyclictest numbers stop decreasing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> 
> Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include <asm/page.h>
>  #include <asm/current.h>
>  #include <asm/apicdef.h>
> +#include <asm/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>
>  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>  #include "kvm_cache_regs.h"
> @@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ static void apic_timer_expired(struct kv
>  {
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = apic->vcpu;
>  	wait_queue_head_t *q = &vcpu->wq;
> +	struct kvm_timer *ktimer = &apic->lapic_timer;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Note: KVM_REQ_PENDING_TIMER is implicitly checked in
> @@ -1087,11 +1089,64 @@ static void apic_timer_expired(struct kv
>  
>  	if (waitqueue_active(q))
>  		wake_up_interruptible(q);
> +
> +	if (apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic))
> +		ktimer->expired_tscdeadline = ktimer->tscdeadline;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * On APICv, this test will cause a busy wait
> + * during a higher-priority task.
> + */
> +
> +static bool lapic_timer_int_injected(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> +	u32 reg = kvm_apic_get_reg(apic, APIC_LVTT);
> +
> +	if (kvm_apic_hw_enabled(apic)) {
> +		int vec = reg & APIC_VECTOR_MASK;
> +
> +		if (kvm_x86_ops->test_posted_interrupt)
> +			return kvm_x86_ops->test_posted_interrupt(vcpu, vec);
> +		else {
> +			if (apic_test_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
> +				return true;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> +	u64 guest_tsc, tsc_deadline;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline == 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!lapic_timer_int_injected(vcpu))
> +		return;

By the time we get here, I think, if expired_tscdeadline != 0 we're sure
that the interrupt has been injected.  It may be in IRR rather than ISR,
but at least on APICv the last test should be redundant.

So perhaps you can get rid of patch 1 and check
kvm_apic_vid_enabled(vcpu->kvm):

	if (k_a_v_e(vcpu->kvm)
		return true;
	if (apic_test_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
		return true;

Does this sound correct?

Paolo



> +	tsc_deadline = apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline;
> +	apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline = 0;
> +	guest_tsc = kvm_x86_ops->read_l1_tsc(vcpu, native_read_tsc());
> +
> +	while (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline) {
> +		int delay = min(tsc_deadline - guest_tsc, 1000ULL);
> +
> +		__delay(delay);
> +		guest_tsc = kvm_x86_ops->read_l1_tsc(vcpu, native_read_tsc());
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
>  {
>  	ktime_t now;
> +
>  	atomic_set(&apic->lapic_timer.pending, 0);
>  
>  	if (apic_lvtt_period(apic) || apic_lvtt_oneshot(apic)) {
> @@ -1137,6 +1192,7 @@ static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_
>  		/* lapic timer in tsc deadline mode */
>  		u64 guest_tsc, tscdeadline = apic->lapic_timer.tscdeadline;
>  		u64 ns = 0;
> +		ktime_t expire;
>  		struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = apic->vcpu;
>  		unsigned long this_tsc_khz = vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz;
>  		unsigned long flags;
> @@ -1151,8 +1207,10 @@ static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_
>  		if (likely(tscdeadline > guest_tsc)) {
>  			ns = (tscdeadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL;
>  			do_div(ns, this_tsc_khz);
> +			expire = ktime_add_ns(now, ns);
> +			expire = ktime_sub_ns(expire, lapic_timer_advance_ns);
>  			hrtimer_start(&apic->lapic_timer.timer,
> -				ktime_add_ns(now, ns), HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
> +				      expire, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
>  		} else
>  			apic_timer_expired(apic);
>  
> Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> ===================================================================
> --- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> +++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct kvm_timer {
>  	u32 timer_mode;
>  	u32 timer_mode_mask;
>  	u64 tscdeadline;
> +	u64 expired_tscdeadline;
>  	atomic_t pending;			/* accumulated triggered timers */
>  };
>  
> @@ -170,4 +171,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_apic_has_events(s
>  
>  bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
>  
> +void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +
>  #endif
> Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> ===================================================================
> --- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_max_guest_tsc_khz)
>  static u32 tsc_tolerance_ppm = 250;
>  module_param(tsc_tolerance_ppm, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>  
> +/* lapic timer advance (tscdeadline mode only) in nanoseconds */
> +unsigned int lapic_timer_advance_ns = 0;
> +module_param(lapic_timer_advance_ns, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> +
>  static bool backwards_tsc_observed = false;
>  
>  #define KVM_NR_SHARED_MSRS 16
> @@ -6311,6 +6315,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_v
>  	}
>  
>  	trace_kvm_entry(vcpu->vcpu_id);
> +	wait_lapic_expire(vcpu);
>  	kvm_x86_ops->run(vcpu);
>  
>  	/*
> Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> ===================================================================
> --- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -170,5 +170,7 @@ extern u64 kvm_supported_xcr0(void);
>  
>  extern unsigned int min_timer_period_us;
>  
> +extern unsigned int lapic_timer_advance_ns;
> +
>  extern struct static_key kvm_no_apic_vcpu;
>  #endif
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Re: [patch 2/3] KVM: x86: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:34:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 15/12/2014 23:06, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > For the hrtimer which emulates the tscdeadline timer in the guest,
> > add an option to advance expiration, and busy spin on VM-entry waiting
> > for the actual expiration time to elapse.
> > 
> > This allows achieving low latencies in cyclictest (or any scenario 
> > which requires strict timing regarding timer expiration).
> > 
> > Reduces average cyclictest latency from 12us to 8us
> > on Core i5 desktop.
> > 
> > Note: this option requires tuning to find the appropriate value 
> > for a particular hardware/guest combination. One method is to measure the 
> > average delay between apic_timer_fn and VM-entry. 
> > Another method is to start with 1000ns, and increase the value
> > in say 500ns increments until avg cyclictest numbers stop decreasing.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > +++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/page.h>
> >  #include <asm/current.h>
> >  #include <asm/apicdef.h>
> > +#include <asm/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/atomic.h>
> >  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> >  #include "kvm_cache_regs.h"
> > @@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ static void apic_timer_expired(struct kv
> >  {
> >  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = apic->vcpu;
> >  	wait_queue_head_t *q = &vcpu->wq;
> > +	struct kvm_timer *ktimer = &apic->lapic_timer;
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Note: KVM_REQ_PENDING_TIMER is implicitly checked in
> > @@ -1087,11 +1089,64 @@ static void apic_timer_expired(struct kv
> >  
> >  	if (waitqueue_active(q))
> >  		wake_up_interruptible(q);
> > +
> > +	if (apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic))
> > +		ktimer->expired_tscdeadline = ktimer->tscdeadline;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * On APICv, this test will cause a busy wait
> > + * during a higher-priority task.
> > + */
> > +
> > +static bool lapic_timer_int_injected(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> > +	u32 reg = kvm_apic_get_reg(apic, APIC_LVTT);
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_apic_hw_enabled(apic)) {
> > +		int vec = reg & APIC_VECTOR_MASK;
> > +
> > +		if (kvm_x86_ops->test_posted_interrupt)
> > +			return kvm_x86_ops->test_posted_interrupt(vcpu, vec);
> > +		else {
> > +			if (apic_test_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
> > +				return true;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> > +	u64 guest_tsc, tsc_deadline;
> > +
> > +	if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline == 0)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (!lapic_timer_int_injected(vcpu))
> > +		return;
> 
> By the time we get here, I think, if expired_tscdeadline != 0 we're sure
> that the interrupt has been injected.  It may be in IRR rather than ISR,
> but at least on APICv the last test should be redundant.
> 
> So perhaps you can get rid of patch 1 and check
> kvm_apic_vid_enabled(vcpu->kvm):
> 
> 	if (k_a_v_e(vcpu->kvm)
> 		return true;
> 	if (apic_test_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
> 		return true;
> 
> Does this sound correct?

* expired_tscdeadline != 0.
* APIC timer interrupt delivery masked at LVTT register.

Implies expired_tscdeadline != 0 and interrupt not injected.

Re: [patch 2/3] KVM: x86: add option to advance tscdeadline hrtimer expiration

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 16/12/2014 16:13, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> > So perhaps you can get rid of patch 1 and check
>> > kvm_apic_vid_enabled(vcpu->kvm):
>> > 
>> > 	if (k_a_v_e(vcpu->kvm)
>> > 		return true;
>> > 	if (apic_test_vector(vec, apic->regs + APIC_ISR))
>> > 		return true;
>> > 
>> > Does this sound correct?
> * expired_tscdeadline != 0.
> * APIC timer interrupt delivery masked at LVTT register.
> 
> Implies expired_tscdeadline != 0 and interrupt not injected.

Good point.

Paolo

[patch 3/3] KVM: x86: add tracepoint to wait_lapic_expire

[Marcelo Tosatti]

[-- Attachment #1: lapic-wait-tracepoint --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1602 bytes --]

Add tracepoint to wait_lapic_expire.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>

Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *
 {
 	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
 	u64 guest_tsc, tsc_deadline;
+	unsigned int total_delay = 0;
 
 	if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
 		return;
@@ -1138,9 +1139,13 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *
 	while (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline) {
 		int delay = min(tsc_deadline - guest_tsc, 1000ULL);
 
+		total_delay += delay;
+
 		__delay(delay);
 		guest_tsc = kvm_x86_ops->read_l1_tsc(vcpu, native_read_tsc());
 	}
+
+	trace_kvm_wait_lapic_expire(vcpu->vcpu_id, total_delay);
 }
 
 static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
+++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
@@ -914,6 +914,25 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_pvclock_update,
 		  __entry->flags)
 );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_wait_lapic_expire,
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned int vcpu_id, unsigned int total_delay),
+	TP_ARGS(vcpu_id, total_delay),
+
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(	unsigned int,	vcpu_id			)
+		__field(	unsigned int,	total_delay		)
+	),
+
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->vcpu_id	   = vcpu_id;
+		__entry->total_delay	   = total_delay;
+	),
+
+	TP_printk("vcpu %u: total_delay %u",
+		  __entry->vcpu_id,
+		  __entry->total_delay)
+);
+
 #endif /* _TRACE_KVM_H */
 
 #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH

Re: [patch 3/3] KVM: x86: add tracepoint to wait_lapic_expire

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 15/12/2014 23:06, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Add tracepoint to wait_lapic_expire.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> 
> Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *
>  {
>  	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>  	u64 guest_tsc, tsc_deadline;
> +	unsigned int total_delay = 0;
>  
>  	if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
>  		return;
> @@ -1138,9 +1139,13 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *
>  	while (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline) {
>  		int delay = min(tsc_deadline - guest_tsc, 1000ULL);
>  
> +		total_delay += delay;
> +
>  		__delay(delay);
>  		guest_tsc = kvm_x86_ops->read_l1_tsc(vcpu, native_read_tsc());
>  	}
> +
> +	trace_kvm_wait_lapic_expire(vcpu->vcpu_id, total_delay);

Let's add guest_tsc - tsc_deadline to the tracepoint.  This should
simplify the tuning of the parameter.

Paolo


>  }
>  
>  static void start_apic_timer(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
> ===================================================================
> --- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
> +++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/trace.h
> @@ -914,6 +914,25 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_pvclock_update,
>  		  __entry->flags)
>  );
>  
> +TRACE_EVENT(kvm_wait_lapic_expire,
> +	TP_PROTO(unsigned int vcpu_id, unsigned int total_delay),
> +	TP_ARGS(vcpu_id, total_delay),
> +
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__field(	unsigned int,	vcpu_id			)
> +		__field(	unsigned int,	total_delay		)
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__entry->vcpu_id	   = vcpu_id;
> +		__entry->total_delay	   = total_delay;
> +	),
> +
> +	TP_printk("vcpu %u: total_delay %u",
> +		  __entry->vcpu_id,
> +		  __entry->total_delay)
> +);
> +
>  #endif /* _TRACE_KVM_H */
>  
>  #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Re: [patch 3/3] KVM: x86: add tracepoint to wait_lapic_expire

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:03:39AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/12/2014 23:06, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Add tracepoint to wait_lapic_expire.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Index: kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- kvm.orig/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > +++ kvm/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > @@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *
> >  {
> >  	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
> >  	u64 guest_tsc, tsc_deadline;
> > +	unsigned int total_delay = 0;
> >  
> >  	if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu))
> >  		return;
> > @@ -1138,9 +1139,13 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *
> >  	while (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline) {
> >  		int delay = min(tsc_deadline - guest_tsc, 1000ULL);
> >  
> > +		total_delay += delay;
> > +
> >  		__delay(delay);
> >  		guest_tsc = kvm_x86_ops->read_l1_tsc(vcpu, native_read_tsc());
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	trace_kvm_wait_lapic_expire(vcpu->vcpu_id, total_delay);
> 
> Let's add guest_tsc - tsc_deadline to the tracepoint.  This should
> simplify the tuning of the parameter.
> 
> Paolo

total_delay is very close to that, except the summands are 

    1000 + 1000 + ... + "remainder"

Yes?

BTW its very easy to tune the parameter with the kvm-unit-test test
(the optimal value is clear). I'll write a document.

Re: [patch 3/3] KVM: x86: add tracepoint to wait_lapic_expire

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 16/12/2014 13:15, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Let's add guest_tsc - tsc_deadline to the tracepoint.  This should
> > simplify the tuning of the parameter.
> 
> total_delay is very close to that, except the summands are 
> 
>     1000 + 1000 + ... + "remainder"
> 
> Yes?

Almost: guest_tsc - tsc_deadline will be negative if the vmentry
overshot the original tsc_deadline.  In that case, total_delay will be zero.

> BTW its very easy to tune the parameter with the kvm-unit-test test
> (the optimal value is clear). I'll write a document.

Nice benefit of the test. :)

Paolo