From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: iommu: Add cond_resched to legacy device assignment
 code
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:50:00 +0100
Message-ID: <20141217105000.GB9373@suse.de>
References: <1418744846-12868-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org>
 <5490DEB1.30305@intel.com>
 <20141217103500.GA9373@suse.de>
 <54915F00.5010304@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54915F00.5010304@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:46:24AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17/12/2014 11:35, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > This file is already gone after one latest commit c274e03af705,
> >> > "kvm: x86: move assigned-dev.c and iommu.c to arch/x86/" is
> >> > introduced, so you need to pull your tree firstly :)
> > Hmm, I based the patch on kvm/master, where the file is still present.
> > What is the branch to base kvm patches on these days?
> 
> kvm/master in the -rc period, kvm/next during the merge window and for
> the next release.  But it's not a problem, I can sort it out.

Great, thanks Paolo. So I will base my future patches on kvm/next.


	Joerg