From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: Add new dirty logging kvm_x86_ops for PML
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:52:49 +0100
Message-ID: <20150205145248.GA14367@potion.redhat.com>
References: <1422413668-3509-1-git-send-email-kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
 <1422413668-3509-6-git-send-email-kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
 <20150203155302.GE19731@potion.redhat.com>
 <54D30DBD.2020300@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, gleb@kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58534 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753475AbbBEOxD (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:53:03 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54D30DBD.2020300@linux.intel.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

2015-02-05 14:29+0800, Kai Huang:
> >>+	/* Still write protect RO slot */
> >>+	if (new->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY) {
> >>+		kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(kvm, new);
> >We didn't write protect RO slots before, does this patch depend on it?
> No PML doesn't depend on it to work. It's suggested by Paolo.

Thanks, it would have deserved a separate patch, IMO.