kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	riel@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, dmatlack@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: optimize delivery of TSC deadline timer interrupt
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:51:37 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150206205137.GA27561@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423225019-11001-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:16:59PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The newly-added tracepoint shows the following results on
> the tscdeadline_latency test:
> 
>         qemu-kvm-8387  [002]  6425.558974: kvm_vcpu_wakeup:      poll time 10407 ns
>         qemu-kvm-8387  [002]  6425.558984: kvm_vcpu_wakeup:      poll time 0 ns
>         qemu-kvm-8387  [002]  6425.561242: kvm_vcpu_wakeup:      poll time 10477 ns
>         qemu-kvm-8387  [002]  6425.561251: kvm_vcpu_wakeup:      poll time 0 ns
> 
> and so on.  This is because we need to go through kvm_vcpu_block again
> after the timer IRQ is injected.  Avoid it by polling once before
> entering kvm_vcpu_block.
> 
> On my machine (Xeon E5 Sandy Bridge) this removes about 500 cycles (7%)
> from the latency of the TSC deadline timer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 0b8dd13676ef..1e766033ebff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -6389,11 +6389,15 @@ static inline int __vcpu_run(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	    !vcpu->arch.apf.halted)
>  		return vcpu_enter_guest(vcpu);
>  
> -	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> -	kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> -	vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> -	if (!kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu))
> -		return 1;
> +	if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu))
> +		clear_bit(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, &vcpu->requests);
> +	else {

Why the clear_bit? Since only kvm_vcpu_block in the below section
sets it, and that section clears it as well.

Can remove another 300 cycles from do_div when programming LAPIC
tscdeadline timer.

> +		srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
> +		kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu);
> +		vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> +		if (!kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu))
> +			return 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu);
>  	switch(vcpu->arch.mp_state) {
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-06 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-06 12:16 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: APIC timer latency improvement Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-06 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: extract guest running logic from __vcpu_run Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 22:44   ` David Matlack
2015-02-10  8:18     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 23:32   ` Rik van Riel
2015-02-06 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: optimize delivery of TSC deadline timer interrupt Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-06 20:51   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2015-02-07 20:33     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-10 19:30       ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150206205137.GA27561@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).