From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: move advertising of KVM_CAP_IRQFD to common code
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:06:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150305120649.00609b50@bahia.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425552886-1848-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:54:46 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> POWER supports irqfds but forgot to advertise them. Some userspace does
> not check for the capability, but others check it---thus they work on
> x86 and s390 but not POWER.
>
> To avoid that other architectures in the future make the same mistake, let
> common code handle KVM_CAP_IRQFD the same way as KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE.
>
> Reported-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 297e21053a52f060944e9f0de4c64fad9bcd72fc
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
Thanks !
Tested-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Marcelo, please apply this for 4.0.
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 -
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 -
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 0c3623927563..17277968e50a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> case KVM_CAP_ONE_REG:
> case KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP:
> case KVM_CAP_S390_CSS_SUPPORT:
> - case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD:
> case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL:
> case KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index bd7a70be41b3..32bf19ef3115 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2744,7 +2744,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> case KVM_CAP_USER_NMI:
> case KVM_CAP_REINJECT_CONTROL:
> case KVM_CAP_IRQ_INJECT_STATUS:
> - case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD:
> case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD_NO_LENGTH:
> case KVM_CAP_PIT2:
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index a1093700f3a4..a2214d9609bd 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2492,6 +2492,7 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(struct kvm *kvm, long arg)
> case KVM_CAP_SIGNAL_MSI:
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
> + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> case KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE:
> #endif
> case KVM_CAP_CHECK_EXTENSION_VM:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-05 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-05 10:54 [PATCH] kvm: move advertising of KVM_CAP_IRQFD to common code Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-05 11:06 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2015-03-11 0:19 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150305120649.00609b50@bahia.local \
--to=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox