From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: arm/arm64: merge GICv3 RD_base and SGI_base register frames Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:53:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20150326215308.74b994ff@arm.com> References: <1427380778-942-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1427380778-942-10-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: christoffer.dall@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, Marcelo Tosatti , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, n.nikolaev@virtualopensystems.com, eric.auger@linaro.org To: Andre Przywara Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:54762 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752961AbbCZVxR (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:53:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1427380778-942-10-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:39:36 +0000 Andre Przywara wrote: > Currently we handle the redistributor registers in two separate MMIO > regions, one for the overall behaviour and SPIs and one for the > SGIs/PPIs. That latter forces the creation of _two_ KVM I/O bus > devices for each redistributor. > Since the spec mandates those two pages to be contigious, we could as > well merge them and save the churn with the second KVM I/O bus device. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara I wonder why we didn't have it that way the first place... Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.