From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Daniel Hansel <daniel.hansel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/15] target-s390x: New QMP command query-cpu-model
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:50:20 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150330195020.GD7031@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427725708-52100-12-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:28:24PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.c b/target-s390x/cpu.c
> index 829945d..1698b52 100644
> --- a/target-s390x/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@
> #define CR0_RESET 0xE0UL
> #define CR14_RESET 0xC2000000UL;
>
> +static inline char *strdup_s390_cpu_name(S390CPUClass *cc)
> +{
> + return g_strdup_printf("%04x-ga%u", cc->proc.type, cc->mach.ga);
> +}
> +
> /* generate CPU information for cpu -? */
> void s390_cpu_list(FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf)
> {
> @@ -74,6 +79,30 @@ CpuDefinitionInfoList *arch_query_cpu_definitions(Error **errp)
>
> return entry;
> }
> +
> +CpuModelInfo *arch_query_cpu_model(Error **errp)
> +{
> + CpuModelInfo *info;
> + S390CPUClass *cc;
> +
> + if (!s390_cpu_models_used()) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
First question is: why you don't want to just return
{ name: "none", accel: ... }
when TYPE_S390_CPU ("-cpu none") is used?
Now, assuming that you really want to return NULL if -cpu none is used,
why don't you just ask for the first CPU (like you already do below) and
check if it is a named CPU model, instead of adding a new global? e.g.:
static bool s390_cpu_class_is_model(S390CPUClass *cc)
{
return cpuid(cc->proc) != 0;
}
CpuModelInfo *arch_query_cpu_model(Error **errp)
{
S390CPUClass *cc;
S390CPUClass *cc;
cc = S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(s390_cpu_addr2state(0));
if (!s390_cpu_class_is_model(cc)) {
return NULL;
}
[...]
}
> + info = g_try_new0(CpuModelInfo, 1);
> + if (!info) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + cc = S390_CPU_GET_CLASS(s390_cpu_addr2state(0));
> + info->name = strdup_s390_cpu_name(cc);
I don't think the current version of strdup_s390_cpu_name() can ever
return NULL. Do you expect it to return NULL in the future?
> + if (!info->name) {
> + g_free(info);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + if (kvm_enabled()) {
> + info->accel = ACCEL_ID_KVM;
This could be a CPUState field, added automatically by
cpu_generic_init() using current_machine->accel.
> + }
> + return info;
> +}
> #endif
>
> static void s390_cpu_set_pc(CPUState *cs, vaddr value)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Eduardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-30 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-30 14:28 [PATCH v4 00/15] s390x cpu model implementation Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] Introduce stub routine cpu_desc_avail Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] target-s390x: Introduce cpu facilities Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] target-s390x: Generate facility defines per cpu model Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] target-s390x: Introduce cpu models Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] target-s390x: Define cpu model specific facility lists Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] target-s390x: Add cpu model alias definition routines Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] target-s390x: Update linux-headers/asm-s390/kvm.h Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 19:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-31 7:25 ` Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] target-s390x: Add KVM VM attribute interface for cpu models Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] target-s390x: Add cpu class initialization routines Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] target-s390x: Prepare accelerator during cpu object realization Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 19:33 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-31 10:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] target-s390x: New QMP command query-cpu-model Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 19:50 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2015-03-31 9:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 20:17 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-30 20:20 ` Eric Blake
2015-03-31 13:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-31 11:21 ` Michael Mueller
2015-03-31 18:28 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-30 20:19 ` Eric Blake
2015-03-31 7:56 ` Michael Mueller
2015-03-31 18:35 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-31 20:09 ` Michael Mueller
2015-04-01 13:01 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-04-01 16:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
2015-04-01 16:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-04-01 19:05 ` Michael Mueller
2015-04-01 19:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
2015-04-01 23:05 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-04-02 7:09 ` Michael Mueller
2015-04-02 15:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] Add optional parameters to QMP command query-cpu-definitions Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 20:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake
2015-03-31 7:42 ` Michael Mueller
2015-03-31 19:46 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-31 19:50 ` Eric Blake
2015-03-31 20:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] target-s390x: Extend " Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 19:54 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] target-s390x: Introduce facility test routine Michael Mueller
2015-03-30 14:28 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] target-s390x: Enable cpu model usage Michael Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150330195020.GD7031@thinpad.lan.raisama.net \
--to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.hansel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox