kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo2.kernel.org@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signals: Generate warning when flush_signals() is called from non-kthread context
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 12:19:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150506101927.GA17291@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150503173401.GA22052@redhat.com>


* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> > --- a/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -427,6 +427,10 @@ void flush_signals(struct task_struct *t)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >
> > +	/* Only kthreads are allowed to destroy signals: */
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)))
> > +		return;
> > +
> 
> But I am not sure this can't make some buggy driver even more buggy.
> Just suppose it does something
> 
> 	do {
> 		if (signal_pending())
> 			flush_signals();
> 	} while (wait_event_interruptible(...));
> 
> and this change will turn this into busy-wait loop.
> 
> So perhaps another change which just adds WARN_ON_RATELIMIT() 
> without "return" will be safer?

Yeah, absolutely.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-06 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-01 17:40 [GIT PULL] VFIO fixes for v4.1-rc2 Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 18:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 18:48   ` Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 20:23     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 22:03       ` Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 19:38   ` [PATCH] signals: Generate warning when flush_signals() is called from non-kthread context Ingo Molnar
2015-05-02  8:30     ` NeilBrown
2015-05-02 16:27       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-07 12:54         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 17:35       ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 13:33         ` Jiri Kosina
2015-05-07 22:37           ` NeilBrown
2015-05-02 11:56     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2015-05-02 16:33     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-03 17:34     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 16:45       ` [PATCH 0/1] signals: don't abuse __flush_signals() in selinux_bprm_committed_creds() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 16:45         ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 19:43           ` Paul Moore
2015-05-06 10:19       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-05-01 20:11   ` [GIT PULL] VFIO fixes for v4.1-rc2 Richard Weinberger
2015-05-01 21:09     ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150506101927.GA17291@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo2.kernel.org@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).