From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] KVM: x86: API changes for SMM support Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:49:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20150521144954.GA10453@potion.brq.redhat.com> References: <1431084034-8425-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1431084034-8425-7-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, bsd@redhat.com To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1431084034-8425-7-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org 2015-05-08 13:20+0200, Paolo Bonzini: > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ struct kvm_run { > __u32 exit_reason; > __u8 ready_for_interrupt_injection; > __u8 if_flag; > - __u8 padding2[2]; > + __u16 flags; (It got lost last review and I'd really like to know ... what is the advantage of giving both bytes to flags?)