From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: stand-alone kvmtool
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:04:57 +0100
Message-ID: <20150603170457.GL17581@arm.com>
References: <54DDD465.3050300@arm.com>
 <20150218155042.GF22017@arm.com>
 <54EB622E.3020700@iki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Asias He <asias.hejun@gmail.com>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
	Ronald Minnich <rminnich@google.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@iki.fi>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54EB622E.3020700@iki.fi>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:23:58PM +0000, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 2/18/15 5:50 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Thanks for doing this. Since it looks unlikely that kvmtool will ever be
> > merged back into the kernel tree, it makes sense to cut the dependency
> > in my opinion.
> 
> I am certainly OK with a standalone repository which preserves the 
> history. Will, would you like to take over the proposed new repository 
> and put it somewhere on git.kernel.org, perhaps?

Finally got around to this with Andre's help, so I'll post a separate
mail advertising it.

Will