From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use entire page for the per-cpu GDT only if paravirt-enabled
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:58:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150928075851.GA23998@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56070241.2030407@redhat.com>
* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/26/2015 09:50 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > NAK. We really should map the GDT read-only on all 64 bit systems,
> > since we can't hide the address from SLDT. Same with the IDT.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand your point.
So the problem is that right now the SGDT instruction (which is unprivileged)
leaks the real address of the kernel image:
fomalhaut:~> ./sgdt
SGDT: ffff88303fd89000 / 007f
that 'ffff88303fd89000' is a kernel address.
fomalhaut:~> cat sgdt.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void)
{
struct gdt_desc {
unsigned short limit;
unsigned long addr;
} __attribute__((packed)) gdt_desc = { -1, -1 };
asm volatile("sgdt %0": "=m" (gdt_desc));
printf("SGDT: %016lx / %04x\n", gdt_desc.addr, gdt_desc.limit);
return 0;
}
Your observation in the changelog and your patch:
> >> It is page-sized because of paravirt. [...]
... conflicts with the intention to mark (remap) the primary GDT address read-only
on native kernels as well.
So what we should do instead is to use the page alignment properly and remap the
GDT to a read-only location, and load that one.
This would have a couple of advantages:
- This would give kernel address randomization more teeth on x86.
- An additional advantage would be that rootkits overwriting the GDT would have
a bit more work to do.
- A third advantage would be that for NUMA systems we could 'mirror' the GDT into
node-local memory and load those. This makes GDT load cache-misses a bit less
expensive.
The IDT is already remapped:
fomalhaut:~> ./sidt
Sidt: ffffffffff57b000 / 0fff
fomalhaut:~> cat sidt.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(void)
{
struct idt_desc {
unsigned short limit;
unsigned long addr;
} __attribute__((packed)) idt_desc = { -1, -1 };
asm volatile("sidt %0": "=m" (idt_desc));
printf("Sidt: %016lx / %04x\n", idt_desc.addr, idt_desc.limit);
return 0;
}
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-28 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-26 18:00 [PATCH] x86: Use entire page for the per-cpu GDT only if paravirt-enabled Denys Vlasenko
2015-09-26 19:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-26 20:38 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-09-28 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-09-28 12:45 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-09-29 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-29 17:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-29 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-09-29 18:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-29 20:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-30 1:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-30 1:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-30 2:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-09-30 2:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-29 18:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-09-29 18:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-29 18:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150928075851.GA23998@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox