From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: Merge vgic_set_lr() and vgic_sync_lr_elrsr()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:54:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151022215434.GD25602@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d9fb027da0d71c9b62bc3ffef1dcd037882ed02.1443796321.git.p.fedin@samsung.com>
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:44:29PM +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> Now we see that vgic_set_lr() and vgic_sync_lr_elrsr() are always used
> together. Merge them into one function, saving from second vgic_ops
> dereferencing every time.
>
> Additionally, remove unnecessary vgic_set_lr() in vgic_unqueue_irqs(),
> because the following vgic_retire_lr() will reset lr.state to zero
> anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
> ---
> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 1 -
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c | 5 -----
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c | 5 -----
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 30 ++++--------------------------
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index d908028..ab5d242 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ struct vgic_vmcr {
> struct vgic_ops {
> struct vgic_lr (*get_lr)(const struct kvm_vcpu *, int);
> void (*set_lr)(struct kvm_vcpu *, int, struct vgic_lr);
> - void (*sync_lr_elrsr)(struct kvm_vcpu *, int, struct vgic_lr);
> u64 (*get_elrsr)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> u64 (*get_eisr)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void (*clear_eisr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> index 8d7b04d..f9d8da5 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -79,11 +79,7 @@ static void vgic_v2_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
> lr_val |= (lr_desc.source << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT);
>
> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_lr[lr] = lr_val;
> -}
>
> -static void vgic_v2_sync_lr_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
> - struct vgic_lr lr_desc)
> -{
> if (!(lr_desc.state & LR_STATE_MASK))
> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr |= (1ULL << lr);
> else
> @@ -166,7 +162,6 @@ static void vgic_v2_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static const struct vgic_ops vgic_v2_ops = {
> .get_lr = vgic_v2_get_lr,
> .set_lr = vgic_v2_set_lr,
> - .sync_lr_elrsr = vgic_v2_sync_lr_elrsr,
> .get_elrsr = vgic_v2_get_elrsr,
> .get_eisr = vgic_v2_get_eisr,
> .clear_eisr = vgic_v2_clear_eisr,
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> index 7dd5d62..75f6d91 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -112,11 +112,7 @@ static void vgic_v3_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
> }
>
> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_lr[LR_INDEX(lr)] = lr_val;
> -}
>
> -static void vgic_v3_sync_lr_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
> - struct vgic_lr lr_desc)
> -{
> if (!(lr_desc.state & LR_STATE_MASK))
> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3.vgic_elrsr |= (1U << lr);
> else
> @@ -211,7 +207,6 @@ static void vgic_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static const struct vgic_ops vgic_v3_ops = {
> .get_lr = vgic_v3_get_lr,
> .set_lr = vgic_v3_set_lr,
> - .sync_lr_elrsr = vgic_v3_sync_lr_elrsr,
> .get_elrsr = vgic_v3_get_elrsr,
> .get_eisr = vgic_v3_get_eisr,
> .clear_eisr = vgic_v3_clear_eisr,
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 2f4d25a..7e164eb 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -709,10 +709,8 @@ void vgic_unqueue_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * interrupt then move the active state to the
> * distributor tracking bit.
> */
> - if (lr.state & LR_STATE_ACTIVE) {
> + if (lr.state & LR_STATE_ACTIVE)
> vgic_irq_set_active(vcpu, lr.irq);
> - lr.state &= ~LR_STATE_ACTIVE;
> - }
>
> /*
> * Reestablish the pending state on the distributor and the
> @@ -720,17 +718,12 @@ void vgic_unqueue_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * is fine, then we are only setting a few bits that were
> * already set.
> */
> - if (lr.state & LR_STATE_PENDING) {
> + if (lr.state & LR_STATE_PENDING)
> vgic_dist_irq_set_pending(vcpu, lr.irq);
> - lr.state &= ~LR_STATE_PENDING;
> - }
> -
> - vgic_set_lr(vcpu, i, lr);
>
> /*
> * Mark the LR as free for other use.
> */
> - BUG_ON(lr.state & LR_STATE_MASK);
> vgic_retire_lr(i, vcpu);
> vgic_irq_clear_queued(vcpu, lr.irq);
>
> @@ -1039,12 +1032,6 @@ static void vgic_set_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
> vgic_ops->set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
> }
>
> -static void vgic_sync_lr_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr,
> - struct vgic_lr vlr)
> -{
> - vgic_ops->sync_lr_elrsr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
> -}
> -
> static inline u64 vgic_get_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return vgic_ops->get_elrsr(vcpu);
> @@ -1096,7 +1083,6 @@ static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> vlr.state = 0;
> vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
> - vgic_sync_lr_elrsr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1160,7 +1146,6 @@ static void vgic_queue_irq_to_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq,
> }
>
> vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
> - vgic_sync_lr_elrsr(vcpu, lr_nr, vlr);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1380,12 +1365,6 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
>
> spin_unlock(&dist->lock);
> -
> - /*
> - * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have
> - * been marked as empty.
> - */
> - vgic_sync_lr_elrsr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1446,8 +1425,6 @@ static void __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> bool level_pending;
>
> level_pending = vgic_process_maintenance(vcpu);
> - elrsr = vgic_get_elrsr(vcpu);
> - elrsr_ptr = u64_to_bitmask(&elrsr);
>
> /* Deal with HW interrupts, and clear mappings for empty LRs */
> for (lr = 0; lr < vgic->nr_lr; lr++) {
> @@ -1463,11 +1440,12 @@ static void __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vlr.hwirq = 0;
> vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
> vgic_irq_clear_queued(vcpu, vlr.irq);
> - set_bit(lr, elrsr_ptr);
> }
> }
>
> /* Check if we still have something up our sleeve... */
> + elrsr = vgic_get_elrsr(vcpu);
> + elrsr_ptr = u64_to_bitmask(&elrsr);
> pending = find_first_zero_bit(elrsr_ptr, vgic->nr_lr);
> if (level_pending || pending < vgic->nr_lr)
> set_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, dist->irq_pending_on_cpu);
> --
This patch looks reasonable assuming I manage to convince myself about
the correctness of the first one.
If you can send out a new set of these rebased on kvmarm/next, and if
Andre has time to test them on GICv3, then I may queue them for v4.4.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-02 14:44 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm/arm64: Clean up some obsolete code Pavel Fedin
2015-10-02 14:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm/arm64: Optimize away redundant LR tracking Pavel Fedin
2015-10-12 16:56 ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-13 15:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-10-22 21:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-10-23 7:12 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-02 14:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: Merge vgic_set_lr() and vgic_sync_lr_elrsr() Pavel Fedin
2015-10-22 21:54 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-10-08 10:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm/arm64: Clean up some obsolete code Christoffer Dall
2015-10-08 10:55 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-08 10:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-08 11:15 ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-08 12:04 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-08 12:33 ` Christoffer Dall
2015-10-08 11:36 ` Pavel Fedin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151022215434.GD25602@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).