From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kvmtool: don't overwrite /virt/init
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:06:35 +0000
Message-ID: <20151027170635.GA22049@arm.com>
References: <20151022155921.GA15527@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57730 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752392AbbJ0RGl (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:06:41 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151022155921.GA15527@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Oleg,

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 05:59:21PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On top of "[PATCH 0/3] kvmtool: tiny init fox x86_64" I sent.
> 
> I simply can't understand why kvmtool always overwrites /virt/init.
> This doesn't look right, especially because you can't pass "init="
> kernel argument without another patch "[PATCH] kvmtool/run: append
> cfg.kernel_cmdline at the end of real_cmdline" I sent. And so far
> it is not clear to me if you are going to accept that patch or not.

Sorry, I was off last week and didn't have email access. I'm going through
my inbox now and your patches look pretty good to me. I'll apply/test and
then push out if I don't see any issues.

Thanks!

Will