kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Shamir Rabinovitch <shamir.rabinovitch@oracle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	arnd@arndb.de, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] dma-mapping-common: add DMA attribute - DMA_ATTR_IOMMU_BYPASS
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 14:42:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151105134206.GD2255@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151102173218.GC12484@shamir-ThinkPad-T430>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 07:32:19PM +0200, Shamir Rabinovitch wrote:
> Correct. This issue is one of the concerns here in the previous replies.
> I will take different approach which will not require the IOMMU bypass
> per mapping. Will try to shift to the x86 'iommu=pt' approach.

Yeah, it doesn't really make sense to have an extra remappable area when
the device can access all physical memory anyway.

> We had a bunch of issues around SPARC IOMMU. Not all of them relate to
> performance. The first issue was that on SPARC, currently, we only have 
> limited address space to IOMMU so we had issue to do large DMA mappings
> for Infiniband. Second issue was that we identified high contention on 
> the IOMMU locks even in ETH driver.

Contended IOMMU locks are not only a problem on SPARC, but on x86 and
various other IOMMU drivers too. But I have some ideas on how to improve
the situation there.

> I do not want to put too much information here but you can see some results:
> 
> rds-stress test from sparc t5-2 -> x86:
> 
> with iommu bypass:
> ---------------------
> sparc->x86 cmdline = -r XXX -s XXX -q 256 -a 8192 -T 10 -d 10 -t 3 -o XXX
> tsks   tx/s   rx/s  tx+rx K/s    mbi K/s    mbo K/s tx us/c   rtt us cpu %
>    3 141278      0 1165565.81       0.00       0.00    8.93   376.60 -1.00  (average)
> 
> without iommu bypass:
> ---------------------
> sparc->x86 cmdline = -r XXX -s XXX -q 256 -a 8192 -T 10 -d 10 -t 3 -o XXX
> tsks   tx/s   rx/s  tx+rx K/s    mbi K/s    mbo K/s tx us/c   rtt us cpu %
>    3  78558      0  648101.41       0.00       0.00   15.05   876.72 -1.00  (average)
> 
> + RDMA tests are totally not working (might be due to failure to DMA map all the memory).
> 
> So IOMMU bypass give ~80% performance boost.

Interesting. Have you looked more closely on what causes the performance
degradation? Is it the lock contention or something else?


	Joerg

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-05 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1445789224-28032-1-git-send-email-shamir.rabinovitch@oracle.com>
     [not found] ` <1445789224-28032-2-git-send-email-shamir.rabinovitch@oracle.com>
2015-10-28  6:30   ` [PATCH v1 2/2] dma-mapping-common: add DMA attribute - DMA_ATTR_IOMMU_BYPASS David Woodhouse
2015-10-28 11:10     ` Shamir Rabinovitch
2015-10-28 13:31       ` David Woodhouse
2015-10-28 14:07         ` David Miller
2015-10-28 13:57           ` David Woodhouse
2015-10-29  0:23             ` David Miller
2015-10-29  0:32         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-10-29  0:42           ` David Woodhouse
2015-10-29  1:10             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-10-29 18:31               ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-29 22:35                 ` David Woodhouse
2015-11-01  7:45                   ` Shamir Rabinovitch
2015-11-01 21:10                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-11-02  7:23                       ` Shamir Rabinovitch
2015-11-02 10:00                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-11-02 12:07                           ` Shamir Rabinovitch
2015-11-02 20:13                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-11-02 21:45                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-02 23:08                                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-11-03 13:11                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-03 19:35                                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-11-02 21:49                               ` Shamir Rabinovitch
2015-11-02 22:48                       ` David Woodhouse
2015-11-02 23:10                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-11-05 21:08                   ` David Miller
2015-10-30  1:51                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-10-30 10:32               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-30 23:17                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-10-30 23:24                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-02 14:51                 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-10-29  7:32             ` Shamir Rabinovitch
2015-11-02 14:44               ` Joerg Roedel
2015-11-02 17:32                 ` Shamir Rabinovitch
2015-11-05 13:42                   ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2015-11-05 21:11                     ` David Miller
2015-11-07 15:06                       ` Shamir Rabinovitch
     [not found]                         ` <CAN+hb0UvztgwNuAh93XdJEe7vgiZgNMc9mHNziHpEopg8Oi4Mg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-11-16  8:42                           ` David Woodhouse
     [not found]                             ` <CAN+hb0UWpfcS5DvgMxNjY-5JOztw2mO1r2FJAW17fn974mhxPA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-11-16 18:42                               ` Benjamin Serebrin
2015-11-16  6:56 Benjamin Serebrin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151105134206.GD2255@suse.de \
    --to=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=shamir.rabinovitch@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).