From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: Provide function for VCPU lookup by id Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:36:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20151119143603.132952e7@thinkpad-w530> References: <1447922251-54261-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1447922251-54261-2-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <564DBC88.5020508@redhat.com> <20151119135527.77ab6fda@thinkpad-w530> <564DCAED.8020805@redhat.com> <564DCD43.8080108@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Huth , Alexander Graf , Paul Mackerras , KVM , Cornelia Huck , Jens Freimann , linux-s390 , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Borntraeger Return-path: Received: from e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.102]:52750 "EHLO e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750815AbbKSNgU (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:36:20 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:36:18 -0000 In-Reply-To: <564DCD43.8080108@de.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On 11/19/2015 02:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > > > On 19/11/2015 13:55, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I'm pretty sure this will cause confusion in the future! > >>>> ==> Could you maybe name the new function something like > >>>> "kvm_lookup_vcpu_by_id" or "kvm_get_vcpu_by_id" instead? > >> Had that in a previous version but decided to name it that way ... hmm ... > >> other opinions? > > > > Having _by_id at the end of the name makes sense indeed. > > David, > I will fix up the function name myself to kvm_get_vcpu_by_id. Ok? Sure, thanks a lot! David