From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] target-i386: kvm: Print warning when clearing
 mcg_cap bits
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:35:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20151125173521.GC4227@pd.tnic>
References: <1448466589-9407-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
 <1448466589-9407-4-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
 <20151125172152.GB4227@pd.tnic>
 <5655EFF5.6030000@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	ying.huang@intel.com,
	Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:40173 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751255AbbKYRfX (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:35:23 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5655EFF5.6030000@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:29:25PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/11/2015 18:21, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> Instead of silently clearing mcg_cap bits when the host doesn't
> >> > support them, print a warning when doing that.
> > Why the host? Why would we want there to be any relation between the MCA
> > capabilities of the host and what qemu is emulating?
> 
> He means the hypervisor. :)

Ah, ok. :)

Then they look good to me, a step in the right direction.

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

Thanks!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.