From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Add lowest-priority support for vt-d posted-interrupts
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 18:21:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151223172138.GC19037@potion.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450229853-3886-3-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.com>
2015-12-16 09:37+0800, Feng Wu:
> Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts for
> VT-d posted-interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -10702,8 +10702,16 @@ static int vmx_update_pi_irte(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
> */
>
> kvm_set_msi_irq(e, &irq);
> - if (!kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu(kvm, &irq, &vcpu))
> - continue;
> +
> + if (!kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu(kvm, &irq, &vcpu)) {
> + if (!kvm_vector_hashing_enabled() ||
> + irq.delivery_mode != APIC_DM_LOWEST)
Hm, wouldn't it actually be easier to extend kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu()
with vector hashing? :)
> + continue;
> +
> + vcpu = kvm_intr_vector_hashing_dest(kvm, &irq);
> + if (!vcpu)
> + continue;
> + }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-23 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-16 1:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add vector-hashing support for lowest-priority interrupts delivery Feng Wu
2015-12-16 1:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts Feng Wu
2015-12-21 1:46 ` Yang Zhang
2015-12-21 1:50 ` Wu, Feng
2015-12-21 2:06 ` Yang Zhang
2015-12-22 4:37 ` Wu, Feng
2015-12-22 6:49 ` Yang Zhang
2015-12-22 6:59 ` Wu, Feng
2015-12-22 7:13 ` Yang Zhang
2015-12-22 7:19 ` Wu, Feng
2015-12-22 19:52 ` rkrcmar
2015-12-23 2:12 ` Wu, Feng
2015-12-23 16:42 ` rkrcmar
2015-12-23 3:17 ` Yang Zhang
2015-12-23 17:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-01-18 5:19 ` Wu, Feng
2016-01-18 10:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-19 4:44 ` Wu, Feng
2016-01-19 13:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-19 13:49 ` Wu, Feng
2016-01-18 14:00 ` Radim Krcmár
2015-12-16 1:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: Add lowest-priority support for vt-d posted-interrupts Feng Wu
2015-12-21 1:50 ` Yang Zhang
2015-12-21 1:55 ` Wu, Feng
2015-12-21 2:01 ` Yang Zhang
2015-12-22 4:36 ` Wu, Feng
2015-12-22 6:42 ` Yang Zhang
2015-12-23 16:50 ` rkrcmar
2015-12-23 17:21 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2016-01-04 1:57 ` Wu, Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151223172138.GC19037@potion.brq.redhat.com \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).