From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: track actual TSC frequency from the timekeeper struct
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 15:25:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160216142544.GA23955@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160216134816.GA21944@amt.cnet>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:18:31PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > When an NTP server is running, it may adjust the time substantially
> > compared to the "official" frequency of the TSC. A 12 ppm change
> > sums up to one second per day.
> >
> > This already shows up if the guest compares kvmclock with e.g. the
> > PM timer. It shows up even more once we add support for the Hyper-V
> > TSC page, because the guest expects it to be in sync with the time
> > reference counter; effectively the time reference counter is just a
> > slow path to access the same clock that is in the TSC page.
> >
> > Therefore, we want kvmclock to provide the host kernel's
> > ktime_get_boot_ns() value, at least if the master clock is active.
> > To do so, reverse-compute the host's "actual" TSC frequency from
> > pvclock_gtod_data and return it from kvm_get_time_and_clockread.
>
> Paolo,
>
> You'd have to generate an update to the guest structures as well,
> to reflect the new {mult,shift} values calculated by the host.
> Here:
>
> /* disable master clock if host does not trust, or does not
> * use, TSC clocksource
> */
> if (gtod->clock.vclock_mode != VCLOCK_TSC &&
> atomic_read(&kvm_guest_has_master_clock) != 0)
> queue_work(system_long_wq, &pvclock_gtod_work);
>
> No?
>
> At first, i'm afraid this might be heavy, so it might be interesting
> to rate limit the update operation.
>
Paolo,
I suppose its not sufficient:
500ppm of 300 seconds = .0005*300 = 0.15 seconds.
Should aim at avoiding time backwards event in the following situation:
T1) t1_kvmclock_read = get_nanoseconds();
/* NTP correction to kernel clock = 500ppm */
/* TSC correction via mult,shift = 0ppm */
VM-exit, update kvmclock (or Hyper-V) clock data with
new values
T2) t2_kvmclock_read = get_nanoseconds();
/* NTP correction to kernel clock = 500ppm */
/* TSC correction via mult,shift = 500ppm */
So should not allow the host clock (or system_timestamp) to diverge
from (TSC based calculation) more than the duration of the event:
VM-exit, update kvmclock (or Hyper-V) with new data.
To avoid t2_kvmclock_read < t1_kvmclock_read
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-08 15:18 [PATCH 0/4] kvmclock: improve accuracy Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-08 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86: rename argument to kvm_set_tsc_khz Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-11 15:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-02-08 15:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86: rewrite handling of scaled TSC for kvmclock Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-11 15:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-02-08 15:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86: pass kvm_get_time_scale arguments in hertz Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-08 15:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: track actual TSC frequency from the timekeeper struct Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-09 18:41 ` Owen Hofmann
2016-02-10 13:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-16 13:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-02-16 14:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2016-02-16 16:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-19 14:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-02-19 15:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-16 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] kvmclock: improve accuracy Marcelo Tosatti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-28 14:04 [PATCH kvm-unit-tests] KVM: x86: add hyperv clock test case Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-28 14:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-28 14:25 ` Andrey Smetanin
2016-01-28 14:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-28 15:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-28 18:45 ` Roman Kagan
2016-01-28 18:53 ` Roman Kagan
2016-01-28 21:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-28 16:22 ` Roman Kagan
2016-02-03 16:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-04 9:33 ` Roman Kagan
2016-02-04 10:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-04 11:12 ` Roman Kagan
2016-04-21 17:01 ` Roman Kagan
2016-04-22 13:32 ` Roman Kagan
2016-04-22 18:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-25 8:47 ` Roman Kagan
2016-04-26 10:34 ` Roman Kagan
2016-05-25 18:33 ` Roman Kagan
2016-05-26 14:47 ` Roman Kagan
2016-05-29 22:34 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160216142544.GA23955@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).