From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: Major KVM issues with kernel 4.5 on the host Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 19:25:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20160320182516.GE4230@pd.tnic> References: <20160317165435.GB3022@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160317181128.GA30324@pd.tnic> <20160318184929.GA949@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160318220429.GH7817@pd.tnic> <20160319000837.GF10135@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160320133158.GD4230@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Marc Haber , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kvm ML To: Andrey Korolyov Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:50823 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750913AbcCTSZU (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:25:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:14:58PM +0300, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > Kinda naive question - do you run same ucode version as Marc on his device? Yeah, we both have 0x010000dc. In case you're referring to the recent faulty AMD microcode patch - it doesn't apply here. The boxes in question are family 0x10 and the microcode patch is for family 0x15. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.