From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Inject pending interrupt even if pending
 nmi exist
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:55:06 +0100
Message-ID: <20160323215506.GA21516@potion.brq.redhat.com>
References: <7CC7D3013F4B10479273CE019E6A8C7A3ED90C@BPXM15GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
 <56F297A7.1030309@redhat.com>
 <20160323172159.GA22164@potion.brq.redhat.com>
 <56F2DEDD.5060600@redhat.com>
 <20160323190406.GB22164@potion.brq.redhat.com>
 <56F3040B.8070006@redhat.com>
 <56F3055C.8090004@siemens.com>
 <56F30664.8050006@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Yuki Shibuya <shibuya.yk@ncos.nec.co.jp>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nobuo Yoshida <yoshida.nb@ncos.nec.co.jp>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50295 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753509AbcCWVzK (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:55:10 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56F30664.8050006@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

2016-03-23 22:11+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 23/03/2016 22:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> > There is also at least one case where you could have one pending (but
>> > not injected) and one latched NMI at instruction boundary, and that is
>> > the special NMI shadow from the STI instruction.
>> 
>> This sounds to me like we should try to address the issue Yuki is seeing
>> without playing with the nmi_pending counter.

I agree, the discussion was mostly offtopic, sorry.

> Yes, it would be nice if my suggestion worked. :)

And if not, we'll at least learn what 2.6.32 is doing. :)