From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
james.hogan@imgtec.com, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:08:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421160841.GD25335@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160421174956.1049e0a5@bahia.huguette.org>
2016-04-21 17:49+0200, Greg Kurz:
> So we're good ?
I support the change, just had a nit about API design for v2.
> Whose tree can carry these patches ?
(PowerPC is the only immediately affected arch, so I'd it there.)
What do you think is best? My experience in this regard is pretty low.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 15:44 [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation Greg Kurz
2016-04-20 16:10 ` James Hogan
2016-04-20 16:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2016-04-21 13:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-04-20 17:02 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-20 17:09 ` James Hogan
2016-04-20 17:27 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-20 17:53 ` Greg Kurz
2016-04-20 18:31 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-20 18:29 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-21 11:29 ` Greg Kurz
2016-04-21 12:26 ` Cornelia Huck
2016-04-21 13:05 ` Greg Kurz
2016-04-21 13:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-04-21 15:29 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-21 15:49 ` Greg Kurz
2016-04-21 16:08 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2016-04-21 17:18 ` Greg Kurz
2016-04-21 17:39 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-21 18:08 ` Greg Kurz
2016-04-22 1:40 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-04-22 13:07 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-04-23 22:54 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160421160841.GD25335@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox