From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel] vfio_pci: Make extended capabilities test more robust
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 10:57:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160428105700.53aa4ff4@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461841492-29277-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:04:52 +1000
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> wrote:
> VFIO reads a dword beyond the standard PCI config space (256 bytes) to
> know if there are extended config space (4096 bytes). It relies on
> the platform to return zero if there is no extended space.
>
> However at least on PPC64/POWERNV platform, the system firmware (OPAL)
> returns 0xffffffff in this case. VFIO treats it as a proof that there is
> extended config space and calls vfio_ecap_init() which fails to parse
> capabilities (which is expected) but right before the exit, it writes
> zero at offset of 256 which is beyond the buffer allocated for
> vdev->vconfig - it is 256 bytes for a device without extended config
> space.
>
> This adds an additional check that config space read returned non-zero
> and non-ffffffff value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> index 142c533..8a53421 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ static int vfio_cap_len(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, u8 cap, u8 pos)
> case PCI_CAP_ID_EXP:
> /* Test for extended capabilities */
> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE, &dword);
> - vdev->extended_caps = (dword != 0);
> + vdev->extended_caps = (dword != 0) && (dword != 0xffffffff);
>
> /* length based on version */
> if ((pcie_caps_reg(pdev) & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_VERS) == 1)
If the device is already telling us that cfg_size is less, why use
heuristics to figure out what the return value might be, just put the
whole thing in a 'if (pdev->cfg_size > PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE)' test.
Looks like the same should be done for PCI-X. Thanks,
Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-28 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-28 11:04 [PATCH kernel] vfio_pci: Make extended capabilities test more robust Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-04-28 16:57 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160428105700.53aa4ff4@t450s.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alistair@popple.id.au \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox