From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] arm64: Add support for KVM with ACPI Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 12:54:14 +0000 Message-ID: <20160502125414.GR27057@io.lakedaemon.net> References: <1460388780-914-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@arm.com> <57220C73.7010900@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, al.stone@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, fu.wei@linaro.org, gg@slimlogic.co.uk To: Marc Zyngier Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57220C73.7010900@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > [+ Thomas, Jason] > > Do you have any objection against this going through the KVM tree? The > dependencies are rather intricate, and Daniel gave us his green light > already for the clocksource part. > > If you'd rather maintain the usual flow, please let us know and we'll > deal with it. I've no objection. Acked-by: Jason Cooper thx, Jason.