From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
james.hogan@imgtec.com, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] kvm: introduce KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:45:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160504164533.GB27590@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146221113787.32310.7342723782230547207.stgit@bahia.huguette.org>
2016-05-03 06:52+0200, Greg Kurz:
> The KVM_MAX_VCPUS define provides the maximum number of vCPUs per guest, and
> also the upper limit for vCPU ids. This is okay for all archs except PowerPC
> which can have higher ids, depending on the cpu/core/thread topology. In the
> worst case (single threaded guest, host with 8 threads per core), it limits
> the maximum number of vCPUS to KVM_MAX_VCPUS / 8.
>
> This patch separates the vCPU numbering from the total number of vCPUs, with
> the introduction of KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID, as the maximal valid value for vCPU ids
> plus one.
>
> The corresponding KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID allows userspace to validate vCPU ids
> before passing them to KVM_CREATE_VCPU.
>
> Only PowerPC gets unlimited vCPU ids for the moment. This patch doesn't
> change anything for other archs.
>
> Suggested-by: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2272,7 +2272,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
> int r;
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>
> - if (id >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
> + if (id >= KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID)
> return -EINVAL;
book3s_hv will currently fail with vcpu_id above threads_per_subcore *
KVM_MAX_VCORES, so userspace cannot use KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID to limit
vcpu_id ... I thought the check for vcpu_id would move to arch-specific
code, like the previous version did, to simplify implementation of a
dynamic limit.
The dynamic limit was too complicated to be worth it?
(This version is ok too.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-04 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-02 17:42 [PATCH v5 0/2] let archs decide for vCPU ids Greg Kurz
2016-05-02 17:45 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] KVM: remove NULL return path for vcpu ids >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS Greg Kurz
2016-05-03 4:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] kvm: introduce KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID Greg Kurz
2016-05-03 6:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2016-05-03 8:56 ` Greg Kurz
2016-05-04 16:45 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2016-05-04 17:50 ` Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160504164533.GB27590@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox