From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] run_tests: print summary
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 18:17:52 +0200
Message-ID: <20160510161752.GF12472@potion>
References: <1460753571-20732-1-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
 <1460753571-20732-9-git-send-email-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
 <20160419071947.3v6fjnbdln47ddno@hawk.localdomain>
 <5731C9F1.80003@redhat.com>
 <20160510124145.GC12472@potion>
 <5731F10D.5030300@redhat.com>
 <20160510153134.GE12472@potion>
 <57320271.1060902@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40813 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751937AbcEJQR4 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 10 May 2016 12:17:56 -0400
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A113B729
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 16:17:55 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57320271.1060902@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

2016-05-10 17:46+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 10/05/2016 17:31, Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 wrote:
>> The former one works.  The latter would work if $RUNTIME_cmd_stdout
>> accepted $kernel as an argument.
>>=20
>>   summary=3D$(eval $cmdline
>>             > >(tee >(RUNTIME_log_stdout $kernel) | extract_summary)=
)
>>
>> Is that acceptable?
>> (I will gladly degrade performance to have less code in eval.)
>=20
> Yeah, same here.  Also "2> >(RUNTIME_log_stderr)"?

Yes.  Time to rewrite it all!