From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 05/13] lib/util: add args_parse_keyval
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 19:19:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160511171930.GA5864@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160511165818.dzk6muttgr5fctw5@hawk.localdomain>
2016-05-11 18:58+0200, Andrew Jones:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:12:47PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> The function parses command line arguments in "key=val" format, and
>> treats "key" as "key=1".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> v4: new
>>
>> lib/util.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> lib/util.h | 10 ++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/util.c b/lib/util.c
>> index 69b18100c972..8b33d474f4c0 100644
>> --- a/lib/util.c
>> +++ b/lib/util.c
>> @@ -16,3 +16,20 @@ int parse_keyval(char *s, long *val)
>> *val = atol(p+1);
>> return p - s;
>> }
>> +
>> +long args_parse_keyval(int argc, char **argv, char *key)
>> +{
>
> I like this better than parse_keyval, except for...
>
>> + int i;
>> + size_t keylen = strlen(key);
>> +
>> + for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
>> + if (keylen > 0 && strncmp(argv[i], key, keylen - 1))
>> + continue;
>> + if (argv[i][keylen] == '\0')
>> + return 1;
>> + if (argv[i][keylen] == '=')
>> + return atol(argv[i] + keylen + 1);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>
> ...this. Here we have ambiguous results. Either key was there
> and had a value of 0, or wasn't there, and we still get zero.
Yes, I implied a boolean key.
> How about merging the two, and then fixing-up the arm and powerpc
> uses of the old one. I'd drop the "args_" from the name then
> too.
Seems reasonable. I'll make a new series:
[1/3] add strncmp
[2/3] add a slightly modified args_parse_keyval,
int __parse_keyval(int argc, char **argv, char *key, long *val)
that will return -1/0/1 on !key/key/key=val
[3/3] replace parse_keyval with renamed __parse_keyval
([2/3] and [3/3] may be squished) The series will depend on your "make
argv[0] the program name" and v5 of mine will depend on it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-11 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-11 16:12 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 00/13] Improve the output of test runners Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 01/13] lib/report: allow test skipping Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 02/13] x86/*: report skipped tests Radim Krčmář
2016-05-17 12:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-25 17:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-05-25 17:23 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-05-26 7:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 03/13] x86/unittests: remove svm-disabled Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 04/13] lib/string: add strncmp Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:33 ` Andrew Jones
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 05/13] lib/util: add args_parse_keyval Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:58 ` Andrew Jones
2016-05-11 17:19 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2016-05-11 17:23 ` Andrew Jones
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 06/13] x86/pmu: expect failure with nmi_watchdog Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 17:00 ` Andrew Jones
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 07/13] lib/report: don't print 0 failed tests Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 08/13] scripts/runtime: consolidate summary tags Radim Krčmář
2016-05-17 12:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-25 17:46 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:12 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 09/13] run_tests: print SUMMARY line in summary Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 17:10 ` Andrew Jones
2016-05-17 12:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-25 17:41 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 10/13] run_tests: log stderr Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 16:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 11/13] scripts/runtime: skip tests that cannot run Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 17:20 ` Andrew Jones
2016-05-11 16:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 12/13] scripts/arch-run: change QEMU failure detection Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 17:24 ` Andrew Jones
2016-05-11 16:30 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 13/13] scripts/run: generalize check Radim Krčmář
2016-05-11 17:31 ` Andrew Jones
2016-05-11 17:11 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 10/13] run_tests: log stderr Andrew Jones
2016-05-17 12:29 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4 00/13] Improve the output of test runners Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-25 17:49 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-05-26 7:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160511171930.GA5864@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).