From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, locking: Remove ticket (spin)lock
 implementation
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 09:16:54 +0200
Message-ID: <20160519071654.GB7745@gmail.com>
References: <20160518184302.GO3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20160518191344.GA9101@char.us.oracle.com>
 <20160518193431.GQ3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Waiman.Long@hpe.com, dhowells@redhat.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160518193431.GQ3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> My motivation was that people keep trying to send patches against the ticket 
> lock code... David did just today, and he's not the first.

Yeah, let's just remove dead code ASAP. It's not like it's hard to add (back) new 
code, should the need arise.

Thanks,

	Ingo