From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Fixing nested SVM event injection
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:20:00 +0200
Message-ID: <20160613092000.GD29948@suse.de>
References: <5742B382.2050006@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33796 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S964844AbcFMJV6 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:21:58 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5742B382.2050006@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:38:42AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> But now I'm loosing interrupts for L2 (keep in mind: under Jailhouse, L1
> takes no interrupts, only NMIs, L2 will get them all). The pattern is
> that an interrupt is received and accepted over L1, but I'm not seeing
> it being injected into L2 after vmrun. What should ensure the injection
> when switching to guest mode?

Does Jailhouse forward the IRQs from L1 to L2 or will they just
pass-through? The nested-svm code checks whether the L2 is supposed to
get the IRQs directly, and injects them if so. At least that is how it
should work, there might be bugs somewhere...



	Joerg