From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Subject: Question on KVM arm64 big.little
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:57:17 +0800
Message-ID: <20160629125700.GA28003@linux-7smt.suse>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: van.freenix@gmail.com
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f65.google.com ([209.85.220.65]:33169 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751962AbcF2M51 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:57:27 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f65.google.com with SMTP id ts6so4409071pac.0
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 05:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Hi experts,

Does kvm ARM64 supports such big.little SoCs(4 A53 cores + 2 A72 cores)?

Would you mind tell me how KVM managed to support Big.Little, if kvm supports it?
If not, please kindly share some knowledge what may need to do to support such SoCs.

Appreciate.

Thanks,
Peng.