From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Peter Hornyack <peterhornyack@google.com>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TSC deadline timer in guests vs. migration?
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:39:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160705203905.GA21766@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03d8c68c-1e86-62bf-f3f2-400a6ef74c25@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:34:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 05/07/2016 15:04, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:51:41AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:45:06PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:30:08PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:01:42PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>>> Can bad things happen if a guest using the TSC deadline timer is
> >>>>> migrated? The guest doesn't re-calibrate the TSC after migration, and
> >>>>> the TSC frequency can and will change unless your data center is
> >>>>> perfectly homogeneous.
> >>>>
> >>>> It can fire earlier if the destination runs at a higher frequency.
> >>>> It will fire past the configured time if the destination runs at a slower frequency.
> >>>>
> >>>> Suppose the first case is worse.
> >>>>
> >>>> Should convert the expiration time to nanoseconds i suppose, and then
> >>>> convert back on the destination.
> >>>
> >>> This won't make any difference if the guest sets up a new timer
> >>> after migration (but using the old TSC frequency), will it?
> >>
> >> It does, because the timer setup traps to the host, where you can
> >> convert it to the proper value:
> >
> > To convert it to the proper value, you need to know what's the
> > TSC frequency the guest is assuming. How would you do that?
>
> In theory with KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ, but it has to be specified manually and
Just read the TSC value where the guest has booted and migrate that.
> I'm not sure anyone has tested this recently. I'm also not sure how
> robust it is, but I'm sure it's fairly slow because it triggers a
> kvmclock update on every vmentry.
But agreed on that the rest of TSC scaling is poorly thought through.
> tsc_always_catchup is high on the list of things that I hate in KVM.
It can be dropped probably. I don't see a need for it (tsc scaling
was never supported properly because of kvmclock).
> I'd like to make KVM_SET_TSC_KHZ fail if TSC scaling is not supported by
> the processor.
>
> Paolo
Thats a good idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-05 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-04 11:01 TSC deadline timer in guests vs. migration? Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-04 19:07 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-07-05 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-04 19:30 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-07-04 19:45 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-07-04 20:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-05 12:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2016-07-05 13:04 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-07-05 13:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-05 18:11 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-07-05 21:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-05 22:12 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-07-06 6:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-05 20:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2016-07-05 21:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160705203905.GA21766@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterhornyack@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox