From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: audit and remove needless module.h includes Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:46:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20160714184603.GR4194@windriver.com> References: <20160714001901.31603-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20160714130443.GA27637@gmail.com> <20160714151835.GO4194@windriver.com> <20160714183903.GA16975@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: , Arjan van de Ven , Boris Ostrovsky , David Vrabel , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Juergen Gross , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Thomas Gleixner , , , To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:50002 "EHLO mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751451AbcGNSrD (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:47:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160714183903.GA16975@gmail.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: [Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86: audit and remove needless module.h includes] On 14/07/2016 (Thu 20:39) Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > > I'll continue testing with the setup_percpu.c change left out. > > > > Let me know if you want a resend or if you want to just add the > > asm/desc.h locally or ... > > So I tried the asm/desc.h but saw other build failures - for now gave up. > Can we do this in a separate patch? Yes of course. In the meantime I'll investigate further and add more configs to my testing. Is there a list of the configs used for sanity testing tip somewhere? Thanks, Paul. -- > > Thanks, > > Ingo