public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 01/17] KVM: arm/arm64: move redistributor kvm_io_devices
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:43:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160715114338.10484-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160715114338.10484-1-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Logically a GICv3 redistributor is assigned to a (v)CPU, so we should
aim to keep redistributor related variables out of our struct vgic_dist.

Let's start by replacing the redistributor related kvm_io_device array
with two members in our existing struct vgic_cpu, which are naturally
per-VCPU and thus don't require any allocation / freeing.
So apart from the better fit with the redistributor design this saves
some code as well.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h           |  8 +++++++-
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c    |  1 -
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 1264037..5142e2a 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ struct vgic_dist {
 	struct vgic_irq		*spis;
 
 	struct vgic_io_device	dist_iodev;
-	struct vgic_io_device	*redist_iodevs;
 };
 
 struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
@@ -193,6 +192,13 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
 	struct list_head ap_list_head;
 
 	u64 live_lrs;
+
+	/*
+	 * Members below are used with GICv3 emulation only and represent
+	 * parts of the redistributor.
+	 */
+	struct vgic_io_device	rd_iodev;
+	struct vgic_io_device	sgi_iodev;
 };
 
 int kvm_vgic_addr(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type, u64 *addr, bool write);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index a1442f7..90cae48 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -271,7 +271,6 @@ static void kvm_vgic_dist_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
 	dist->initialized = false;
 
 	kfree(dist->spis);
-	kfree(dist->redist_iodevs);
 	dist->nr_spis = 0;
 
 	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
index a0c515a..fc7b6c9 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
@@ -285,21 +285,14 @@ unsigned int vgic_v3_init_dist_iodev(struct vgic_io_device *dev)
 
 int vgic_register_redist_iodevs(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t redist_base_address)
 {
-	int nr_vcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
-	struct vgic_io_device *devices;
 	int c, ret = 0;
 
-	devices = kmalloc(sizeof(struct vgic_io_device) * nr_vcpus * 2,
-			  GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!devices)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
 	kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, vcpu, kvm) {
 		gpa_t rd_base = redist_base_address + c * SZ_64K * 2;
 		gpa_t sgi_base = rd_base + SZ_64K;
-		struct vgic_io_device *rd_dev = &devices[c * 2];
-		struct vgic_io_device *sgi_dev = &devices[c * 2 + 1];
+		struct vgic_io_device *rd_dev = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.rd_iodev;
+		struct vgic_io_device *sgi_dev = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.sgi_iodev;
 
 		kvm_iodevice_init(&rd_dev->dev, &kvm_io_gic_ops);
 		rd_dev->base_addr = rd_base;
@@ -335,14 +328,15 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodevs(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t redist_base_address)
 	if (ret) {
 		/* The current c failed, so we start with the previous one. */
 		for (c--; c >= 0; c--) {
+			struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu;
+
+			vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, c);
+			vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
 			kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,
-						  &devices[c * 2].dev);
+						  &vgic_cpu->rd_iodev.dev);
 			kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,
-						  &devices[c * 2 + 1].dev);
+						  &vgic_cpu->sgi_iodev.dev);
 		}
-		kfree(devices);
-	} else {
-		kvm->arch.vgic.redist_iodevs = devices;
 	}
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.9.0

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-15 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-15 11:43 [PATCH v10 00/17] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 02/17] KVM: arm/arm64: check return value for kvm_register_vgic_device Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 03/17] KVM: extend struct kvm_msi to hold a 32-bit device ID Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 04/17] KVM: arm/arm64: extend arch CAP checks to allow per-VM capabilities Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 05/17] KVM: kvm_io_bus: add kvm_io_bus_get_dev() call Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 06/17] KVM: arm/arm64: VGIC: add refcounting for IRQs Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 07/17] irqchip: refactor and add GICv3 definitions Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 08/17] KVM: arm64: handle ITS related GICv3 redistributor registers Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 09/17] KVM: arm64: introduce ITS emulation file with MMIO framework Andre Przywara
2016-07-18  9:18   ` Auger Eric
2016-07-18  9:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-07-18 10:06       ` Auger Eric
2016-07-18 16:34     ` Andre Przywara
2016-07-18 16:36       ` Auger Eric
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 10/17] KVM: arm64: introduce new KVM ITS device Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 11/17] KVM: arm64: implement basic ITS register handlers Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 12/17] KVM: arm64: connect LPIs to the VGIC emulation Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 13/17] KVM: arm64: read initial LPI pending table Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 14/17] KVM: arm64: allow updates of LPI configuration table Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 15/17] KVM: arm64: implement ITS command queue command handlers Andre Przywara
2016-07-16 10:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-07-17 23:23     ` André Przywara
2016-07-18  7:46       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-07-18  7:45     ` André Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 16/17] KVM: arm64: implement MSI injection in ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2016-07-15 11:43 ` [PATCH v10 17/17] KVM: arm64: enable ITS emulation as a virtual MSI controller Andre Przywara
2016-07-18 13:12 ` [PATCH v10 00/17] KVM: arm64: GICv3 ITS emulation Auger Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160715114338.10484-2-andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox