From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0034/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:25:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802132509.GD3608@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160802103601.16039-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
2016-08-02 18:36+0800, Baole Ni:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ enum {
> -module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
> +module_param(dbg, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
Please change to "S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO".
0444 -> S_IRUGO should also be applied to other kvm patches.
The result is still less readable than 0644 for me, because octal
numbers are practically never used outside of well known access
permissions and those macros have to be read painfully carefully, but
macros avoid an arbitrary cutoff from flags that might not be known by
heart by all developers, maybe starting at S_ISVTX.
Btw. the posting could be improved with a cover letter that would link
all patches to it; the series will be easier to handle in mail clients
and there will be a clear place for common discussion about the
patchset. Optionally merge related patches; one patch per subsystem
would be ideal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 10:36 [PATCH 0034/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni
2016-08-02 13:25 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2016-08-02 13:59 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160802132509.GD3608@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=baolex.ni@intel.com \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox